Updated: 11 September 2021



The PanAm 103 Air-Tragedy
Disclosure of "Lockerbie Affair"

Link: Prof. Robert Black's Breaking News
Link: THE LOCKERBIE DIVIDE
Link: http://www.facebook.com/edwin.bollier
Link: UTA 772 aircrash
Link: https://pt35b.wordpress.com
Link: https://twitter.com/optium22

Archive 2002 >> 2021





11 September, 2021


By request:
Mr. Edwin Bollier, what do you want to achieve with your persistence (insistence) - in clearing up a fraud of evidence with a MST13 Timer Fragment (PT35) - in the 'Lockerbie/PanAm103' case ?

Answers:
1.) I want to achieve justice and the claim of big damages.

2.) Consequential: For uncovering the truth for the bereaved families of the 11 victims of Lockerbie and the 259 victims of Flight PanAm103 (PA103).

3.) Crucial and decisive for me: To exonerate the State of LIBYA and for the innocent, wrongly convicted, Libyan citizen - Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and to honour his family.

4.) My wish: To go down in 'Libyan history' - as the saviour of the truth in the politically, orchestrated "Lockerbie Affair".

best Edwin Bollier MEBO is waiting for the next step, a professionalism meeting at Scotland.


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




21 August, 2021

An evidence fraud with a MST13 timer fragment PT35; PT35/B, must be convicted as criminal intent in the "Lockerbie Affair/PanAm 103" !

'OPERATION SANDWOOD' of Police Scotland, bears great responsibility, among other things, for the negative result of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi's/Libya Appeal.

The attached letter - submitted via MSP, for the Justice Committee, Scottish Parliament - is part of Police Scotland's fraudulent final report by "Operation Sandwood" after a 4-year investigation. It is also a document of evidence for favouring crucial criminal offenses, deliberately carried out by officials.

It describes that a dedicated team of detectives has spent four years long (2015-2018) examining the allegations and their findings have been validated by senior Queen's Counsel, entirely unconnected with and acting independently from the Crown Office. The full report is still not published in the public domain.

The Lord Advocate was informed about the result of the final report "Operation Sandwood" and concluded that there was no evidence of criminality and therefore also no basis to submit a standard prosecution report...

The investigation material collected during the inquiry and the findings and conclusions reached by «Operation Sandwood» has crucial relevance to the ongoing live investigation and «Criminal Complain against Police Scotland; Lockerbie bombing PanAm 103 (Operation Sandwood).»

The «Criminal Complaint», containing 10 accusations and many attachments was handed over to the Crown Office officials by MEBO & Edwin Bollier, Switzerland.

The financial damage suffered by MEBO Ltd as a result of the evidence fraud with involving an MST13 timer fragment (PT35; PT35/B) has caused for MEBO Ltd & owner, damages in excess of $200 million (together with "reputational damages").

Police Scotland must be required under positive investigation results to disclose the true intentions of the evidence fraud.

MEBO is waiting for the next step, a professionalism meeting at Scotland.

Pls. see also LINK: https://www.theguardian.com/.../nick-cohen-lockerbie...
and second LINK: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/apr/17/lockerbie..


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




4 August, 2021




by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




24 June, 2021



Provable accusations against the
«OPERATION SANDWOOD REPORT» of Police Scotland...


The final report by «Operation Sandwood» confirmed that there was no evidence of criminality by the investigators. The «Criminal Complaint» filed by MEBO Ltd/Edwin Bollier against Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood) concludes that evidence fraud occurred and favouritism of officials.

The investigation was deliberately and wilfully, not properly conducted. It resulted in preferential treatment of criminal handlings by officials and experts and thwarted the implementation of charges.

The 10 provable accusations by MEBO, in comparison with the Sandwood report, will quickly and easily confirm that there is solid evidence of criminality. Unfortunately, the flawed assessment influenced to a great extent the negative result of the Appeal by the Megrahi Family and causes serious damage to the detriment of LIBYA and MEBO.

Important, flashback: 15 years after the "Lockerbie Court verdict" (2000/01) against Libyan official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, the Scottish politician and member of the Scottish National Party, Christine Grahame (MSP), demanded a new investigation from Police Scotland as new facts were uncovered. This was approved by the Scottish Parliament and it took around 4 years to complete an investigation (Operation Sandwood).

The report from Police Scotland (OPERATION SANDWOOD) was allegedly made by a dedicated team of detectives who have spent the last four years examining the allegations. Their findings have been validated by a senior Queen's Counsel, entirely unconnected with the case and acting independently from the Crown Office.

Officers allegedly carried out a methodical and rigorous inquiry using the major investigation framework under the direction of an experienced Senior Investigating Officer. The Lord Advocate was after that informed that the 'OPERATION SANDWOOD' investigation is complete and that there is no evidence of criminality and therefore no basis to submit a standard prosecution report...

MEBO did not accept the result of the «OPERATION SANDWOOD» investigation and therefore filed a «Criminal Complaint against Police Scotland» and requests that this fraudulent report must be investigated and corrected.

Here is the deliberate and maliciously edited "Sandwood assessment letter" forwarded to Parliament, that has significantly influenced a.o. the negative outcome of the appeal by the AL Megrahi family and has done serious damage to the detriment of LIBYA and MEBO !


SIO Stuart Henderson and the at that time (1990) resigning Police chief constable Sir John Orr, were not called as witnesses in the "Lockerbie/PanAm103 trial 2000", in Kamp van Zeist, unfortunately!!!

Did the two Detective Chief Supperintendents of Police Scotlands - Sir John ORR (aged 77) and Stuart HENDERSON (aged79) - take much too soon, the secret of the TRUTH in evidence - in the "Lockerbie/PanAm103 Affair" - whit them in their graves ?

There was an astonishing change of leader ship - followed by mysterious activities around the MST13 timer fragment (PT35 & PT35/B) - in the time window of November 1989 and June 1990.

The MEBO fact-finding committee will have a closer look at the reasons behind the change of leadership - stay tuned...!


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




14 June, 2021

Lockerbie Tragedy/PanAm103. The switch from Iran or Syria to LIBYA...
Did the secret US disinformation Op shift the blame on LIBYA?

In the early days after the crash of PanAm 103 on Lockerbie the investigators suspected the PFLP-GC behind the bombing. Later it all changed and the blame was shifted on LIBYA.

LINK INTEL TODAY: https://inteltoday.org/.../two-years-ago-blast-from-the.../

Vincent Cannistraro was director of NSC Intelligence from 1984 to 1987 and went on to serve as chief of operations for the CIA’s
Counterterrorism Center and to lead the CIA’s investigation into the bombing of PanAm 103. When he took office the focus was soon diverted to L. A secret disinformation Op against LIBYA was tasked by US President Reagan to Vincent Cannistraro, in 1989 or earlier, to lead a disinformation campaign to destabilise LIBYA and destroy the "Gaddafi regime" in Tripoli.

After the terror attack on the Disco «La Belle» it was time for the US to take action. Intercepted phone calls were the only evidence that Libya was behind the bomb attack in Berlin. True od faked messages by CRYPTO – cypher machines? The Swiss company was secretly owned at the time by CIA and BKA.
Before waiting for the results of BKA investigations, US president Reagan decided to punish LIBYA by bombing parts of LIBYA on 14th March 1986. The raid failed to kill Muhamar Gaddaffi. Of course, US authorities never admitted that he was the main target.

Quote IntelToday: On 2nd October 1986, Bob Woodward (Washington Post) published an extraordinary story: “Gadhafi Target of Secret U.S. Deception Plan”. Under orders from the White House, the US Intelligence Community was planting false information in the US media.
After the bomb attack on the PanAm103, Mr. John Bolton said in a Hearing of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate on May 4, (even before the verdict of the «Lockerbie trial») that it was a mistake not to punish LIBYA in the aftermath of the Lockerbie disaster.

We should have followed President Reagan's example in the wake of the 'La Belle Disco' bombing. We should have attacked LIBYA militarily and hopefully gotten a little bit luckier than the Reagan administration bombing. In other words, getting rid of Muhamar Gaddaffi... It never happened but the US disinformation op was still ongoing and the blame for the bomb attack was shifted to the LIBYANs.

The first link to LIBYA appeared in January 1990. RARDE discovered a tiny piece of a circuit board. It later turned out to be a part of an MST- 13 timer fragment. The manufacturer was identified later as the Swiss MEBO Ltd. in Zurich/Switzerland. This successful telecommunication company delivered a small batch of MST-13 timers to the military procurement in LIBYA, two (2) years befor the Lockerbie tragedy.

In spring 1990 an FBI photo of the fragment PT-35 was presented to the owners of MEBO by the Swiss Police BUPO. A closer look revealed that it was not a Timer as delivered to the Libyans but instead an early handmade unfunctional prototype. The intention to use it to blame LIBYA ended in a dead-end street... because no such handmade prototypes have ever been delivered to LIBYA.

Edwin Bollier filed several requests to see this crucial photo again. The Swiss authorities handed the picture over to the investigators in Scotland. Several requests to return it to Switzerland were ignored. This important photo is still missing... What are they hiding?

It is still a mystery how and why this prototype fragment landed on the laboratory desk of MEBO Engineer Ulrich Lumpert in Zurich in autumn – before X-mas 1989. After the Court in Zeist Edwin Bollier discovered on an enlarged photo 3 (tree) scratch marks and the letter «M» on the original fragment PT-35.

Engineer Lumpert admitted in an affidavit that he made it. In photo 334, which was made following the discovery of the fragment at RARDE, the marks are visible.

The unanswered question remains: How was it possible that the fragment came in autumn 1989 into the hands of Engineer Lumpert – it would mean - before it was discovered by RARDE in 22nd January 1990.

The discovery date 12th May1989 as accepted by the court was only based on a lie (under oath) by forensic experts. Dr Thomas Hayes. The delivery of the fragment to Engineer Lumpert to the MEBO lab in Switzerland involves Scottish, US and Swiss officials !

This important quote was made by Engineer Lumpert in June 2021. It all happened in absence of the two MEBO owners Edwin Bollier and Erwin Meister. A new investigation must bring light to this crucial manipulation of a piece of key evidence and the rather curious time frame...
The fact was that a prototype timer could no longer be used to blame Libya. To maintain the story it was necessary to change from a dark charred fragment (brownish circuit board Material – never ever used by Thüring) to a green MST-13 fragment (Thüring circuit board material).
A major manipulation occurred at the Siemens laboratory in Munich/ Germany. The original fragment as discovered by RARDE was cut into two parts. There was no forensic reason to do this – all material facts have been identified before in the UK.

The only reason for the fragment cutting leads to the assumption that a patchwork could be created. Exchange of the larger part by a green circuit board part and combine it with the charred small original circuit board part.
For many years Edwin Bollier requested to see the MST-13 fragment – only seen so far on photos. Finally, he was invited by the Crown office to Scotland. They put the two fragments on different days on the desk before him. He inspected them with his special magnifying glass. He saw a shiny green fragment part und the charred smaller original piece.

His protest was protocolled in two police statement. Finally, he asked that a witness must be called to confirm his observations about the different colours of the fragments. Police officer Kate Thomson did this job but was not allowed to say what she observed. Edwin Bollier – up to this date had no access to her witness statement. A phone call to her revealed that she is not allowed to talk about what she has seen.

The next time he was confronted with the two fragments in sealed glass tubes was as witness No at the Lockerbie trial. Again he could examine the two fragment parts. He concluded the same as in Dumfries. He has seen a green fragment part and an even more charred original part.

His protest at the Court concerning the manipulation was ignored. The manipulated MST-13 parts have been used as key evidence to blame LIBYA and finally lead to the conviction of Abdelbasset al-Megrahi!

Important facts, among others, from the US court statements and the secret FBI report No 262-23 (only declassified after the Trial in Zeist), were ignored in the "Lockerbie Process" and also not followed up in the Appeal of the Megrahi family at the Scottish High Court.

The FBI did not make a forensic comparison with the first, original black charred fragment (PT35), but instead with a crucial fake (PT35/B) fragment duplicate (green in colour), brought in June 1990.
It was handed over to the FBI laboratory and expert Tom Thurman in Washington, by Scottish Officials under SIO DI Stuart Henderson (Police Scotland).
The positive result by controversial comparison with the faked fragment (PT35/B) and the TOGO timer (K-1) was leading to the indictment of LIBYA.
A comparison with the first original fragment PT-35 (see picture, No 334) - opposite the fragment duplicate, would have shown a very different result, without any chance to indict LIBYA.

The first original fragment PT 35 derived from a non-functional MST-13 prototype circuit board, it was black carbonized with 3 scratch marks and a letter (M) on it.

VERY IMPORTANT
FACT: This kind of prototype was never sold by MEBO Ltd to LIBYA.
Therefore LIBYA could never have been indicted with this MST13 timer prototype fragment (PT35)!

Who is responsible for the various manipulations? One thing is clear – all involved authorities had access to Original Thüring circuit boards.
With this materials, it would have been easy to fabricate fake fragments, or so-called control samples. SCCRC never came up with answers and continued describing Edwin Bollier as an unreliable witness not worth talking to.

Also «Operation Sandwood» by Police Scotland failed to dig deeper in the chain of manipulations. They comcluded that no criminal handlings by the investigating officers or expert occurred.
MEBO cannot accept the obvious thwarting and whitewash of the investigators and filed end of 2020 a «Criminal Complaint» against Police Scotland.

The Professional Standards Department of Police Scotland confirmed early 2021 the receipt of the «Criminal Complaint».
They informed MEBO’s lawyer that due to the complexities of the matters reported, these items remain under assessment.
Next steps: Edwin Bollier looks forward to explaining the content of the 10 accusations and supplements in detail at a requested meeting with the Police staff in Scotland.
This report covers only a fraction of what happened in the Lockerbie Affair. For more revealing details about the MST-13 fragment or the lies (under oath) by expert Dr. Thomas Hayes (RARDE) at the Court.

Please see the video film from Eng. Ulrich Lumpert (MEBO)
LINK: https://www.facebook.com/edwin.bollier/videos/4019519001460795/


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




10 June, 2021

Lockerbie/PanAm103 affair:
A wrong comparison led to the unjust accusation against LIBYA.


1) > Why did 'Police Scotland' (Operation Sandwood), during the 4year "Lockerbie/PanAm'103, Investigation", deliberately concealed evidence fraud involving in the most important, central piece of evidence of an MST13 timer circuit board fragment (PT35) and the deliberately mendacious testimony under oath of 'RARDE' expert (No.586) Dr Thomas Hayes?

MEBO reproach: As the Sandwood report concluded «No criminality» in the handling of Lockerbie bombing investigation... and there will be no criminal prosecution, it purposely influenced the negative verdict in the Appeal of the Megrahi family. Mebosupplied to Operation Sandwood several facts about the manipulations around the MST-13 fragment. It was purposely ignored to the detriment of the Megrahi Family.

Libya and MEBO. We assume that the «carte blanche» report by Operation Sandwood also made it possible for SCCRC not to refer the possible ground for miscarriage of justice about the MST-13 timer to the High Court. This was a tricky step to lead the case in a wrong direction. MEBO never accepted the result of the «Operation Sandwood report» and filed a «Criminal complaint against Police Scotland» because the the investigation was deliberately and wilfully, not properly conducted and it resulted in preferential treatment of criminal handlings by officials and thwarted the implementaton of charges.

MEBO interpretation again: The evidence material of PI-995, was deliberately registered on a fake, addition Page 51, in the 'RARDE' Report 181, with a fake discovery date of May 12,1989, and an MST13 Timerfragment (PT35) with a false description of the circuit board colour - green instead of dark chared.

It was only after the verdict against Al Megrahi and LIBYA 2000/01, at Lockerbie Trial Camp van Zeist, disclosed that the MST13 timer fragment (PT35) was first discovered on 22nd January 1990, by expert Dr. Thomas Hayes, in a slalom shirt at RARDE. The Court accepted May 12, 1989 as the discovery date of the fragment.
This turned out to be false.

Previously, in late 1989, the MST13 timer fragment (PT35) was handed over to Engineer Ulrich Lumpert, in the laboratory of MEBO Ltd at Zurich/Switzerland. Engineer. Lumpert made 3 scratches on the charred MST13 timer fragment (PT35) and the letter «M». The scratch marks can be clearly seen in photo No 334.

It means, that the scratch marks have been made before the fragment (PT35) was discovered in a Slalom shirt at RARDE, on 22nd January 1990...!
see video film LINK: https://www.facebook.com/edwin.bollier/videos/4019519001460795/

2) > The judgment of the Scottish Justice 2000/01, on the "Bombing of PanAm103", was a politically motivated vanguard against the Gaddafi regime and is based on a sea of lies!
A big lie at the Court in Zeist by experts was the false discovery date (12th May 1989), of the original fragment (PT35). Unfortunately the judges were misled.
Another accepted lie was the colour of the fragment - green instead of black charred.

Important facts, among others, from the US court statements and the secret FBI report No 262-23 (only declassified after the Trial in Zeist), were ignored in the "Lockerbie Process".
The FBI did not make a forensic comparison with the first, original black charred fragment (PT35), but instead with a crucial fake (PT35/B) fragment duplicate (green in colour) brought in June 1990. It was handed over to FBI laboratory and to expert Tom Thurman in Washington, by Scottish Officials under SIO DI Stuart Henderson (Police Scotland).

The positive result by controversial comparison with the faked fragment (PT35/B) and the TOGO timer (K-1) was definitely leading to the indictment of LIBYA.



A comparison with the first original fragment PT-35 (see picture, red circle) - opposite the fragment duplicate, would have shown a very different result.
Why?
The first original fragment derived from a non-functional MST-13 prototype circuit board, is black carbonized with 3 scratch marks and a letter (M) on it.

VERY IMPORTANT FACT:
This kind of prototype was never sold by MEBO Ltd to LIBYA. Therefore LIBYA could never have been indicted with this prototype fragment (PT35)!


see video film LINK: https://www.facebook.com/edwin.bollier/videos/4019519001460795/




Following the criminal complaint filed by Edwin Bollier & MEBO Ltd., against Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood) - the Director of the Swiss Intelligence Service (NDB), Jean-Philippe Gaudin, who must step down in August 2021, has informed on 2nd June '21, to Edwin Bollier/ MEBO Ltd., under others, that the relevant Swiss criminal investigation authorities is also been activated to investigate the matter...

Claimant from 11th November 2020, to CROWN OFFICE, Edinburgh, SCOTLAND.





RE: Criminal complaint against Police Scotland; "Lockerbie bombing PanAm103", (Operation Sandwood) by Edwin Bollier/MEBO Ltd. Telecommunication, Switzerland; about manipulated MST13 Timer Fragment (PT35, PT35/B).






by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




26 Mai, 2021



Reminder: It must now be investigated whether after a 4 year - apparently flawed investigation by Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood) - the appeal of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi/LIBYA, was brought down?

Operation Sandwood, which looked at nine (9) allegations made by the Justice for Al Megrahi/LIBYA, has found alleged no evidence of criminality inside Police Scotland.

A dedicated team of detectives has spent the last four years examining the allegations and their findings have been validated by a senior Queen's Counsel, entirely unconnected with and acting independently from the Crown Office.

The Lord Advocate was informed that Operation Sandwood is now complete and that there is no evidence of criminality.

The material collated during the inquiry and the findings and conclusions reached have relevance to both the ongoing live investigation and the potential appeal against conviction lodged on behalf of the late Mr Megrahi. The materials have therfore been handed to Crown Office officials.

Edwin Bollier & MEBO Ltd Telecommunication in Switzerland, have not accept 'Operation Sandwood,s' result: "there would be no evidence of criminality from Police Scotland, and therfore no basis to submit a standard prosecution report"!

This concerns for MEBO, only the constructed facts on the most important, central piece of evidence of the MST13 Timer Circuit Board (PT35, PT35/B) > Part 5/b in Grounds of review Conviction.

Claimant from 11th November 2020 to CROWN OFFICE, Edinburgh, SCOTLAND.
RE: “Criminal complaint against Police Scotland; Lockerbie bombing PanAm103, (“Operation Sandwood”) by Edwin Bollier/MEBO Ltd. Telecommunication, Switzerland; about manipulated MST13 Timer Fragment (PT35, PT35/B).

Accusation No. 1

The main reason for the complaint:
The investigation of "Operation Sandwood" was not properly conducted and resulted in preferential treatment of criminal handlings by officials and experts and they thwarted the implementation of charges.

Their task was an investigation over allegations of perjury, evidence tampering and attempts to pervert the course of justice. The Criminal complaint contains 10 detailed accusations.

The whole process in the Scottish Lockerbie evidence scam - against LIBYA and Mr Abdelbasset al Megrahi - is based on criminal reverse engineering with two manipulated MST-13 timer fragments (PT35) and PT35/B).



Now 'Professional Standarts' Police Scotland, Dalmarnock, have contacted MEBO LTD regarding this matter (MST13 Timer).
°°°
NEXT STEPS, RE: «Criminal Complaint against Police Scotland»; Lockerbie bombing PanAm103 (Operation Sandwood) about manipulated MST13 Timer Fragment (PT35, PT35/b).
Crown Office updated MEBO’s lawyer that Police Scotlands Professional Standards Department, will review the «Criminal Complaint».
Due to the complexities of the matters reported, the Professional Standard Department advised MEBO that these items remain under assessment…
°Additional correspondence dated 25 January 2021- 'Supplement containing statement of Susan McNarey (seconded as a Chief Superintendent).
° Additional correspondence dated 11 March 2021, which was submitted to Crown Office.


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




1th May, 2021

Criminal Complaint against Police Scotland;
Lockerbie bombing PanAM 103
(“Operation Sandwood”)




Claimant: EDWIN BOLLIER / MEBO AG
Badenerstrasse 414, CH 8004 Zurich/Switzerland

Accused: POLICE SCOTLAND, Glasgow, Scotland, UK


Accusation No. 1
The main reason for the complaint:
The investigation of “Operation Sandwood” was deliberately and wilfully not properly conducted and resulted in preferential treatment of criminal handlings by officials and experts and they thwarted the implementation of charges. Their task was an investigation over allegations of perjury, evidence tampering and attempts to pervert the course of justice.



Accusation No. 2
“Operation Sandwood” by Scottish Police failed to interrogate ex-MEBO engineer Ulrich Lumpert. (see written confirmation by Ulrich Lumpert.) He played a crucial role by having access, in autumn 1989, to the MST-13 (PT35) fragment, before it was discovered at RARDE in January 1990. That’s even more astonishing as the Judge at the Trial asked Dr. Hayes: (Court Transcript)

Q: And you record in those notes on page 51 that PT35/B was trapped in the collar of a shirt or in a piece of material
A: Yes
Q: So that fragment could not, presumably, have come to light, so far as the police were concerned before it is extracted from the cloth by yourself?
A: That is correct, yes.
Q: It would follow that it could not have been seen by the police prior the cloth being passed to you at RARDE and the article being extracted by you from the trapped area of material?
A: I’am sure that’s the case.

It is a mystery how the fragment with the scratch marks on it, found its way into the shirt at RARDE... It would have been a major challenge for “Operation Sandwood” to bring light into this. It had the potential to change the complete story around the key piece of evidence.

Engineer Ulrich Lumpert made in autumn 1989, the tree scratch marks and letter “M” (= Muster/sample or MEBO) on the fragment. The scratch marks on the fragment were only discovered after the Trial. An interrogation of Mr Lumpert by “Operation Sandwood” would have revealed that the authorities knew at a very early time that MEBO was the manufacturer of the MST-13 timers and why he scratched on the fragment. It would have also revealed when the Original fragment was brought to Engineer Ulrich Lumpert and he could have confirmed that a Swiss official and a second person was present. The second person was possibly Tom Thurman (FBI). After looking at several photos Ulrich Lumpert identified this person, with the highest probability, as Tom Thurman.

Mr Lumpert was always ready to talk to “Operation Sandwood” but was not interrogated. He is also willing to appear as a witness at the Scottish High Court.

The fact that Ulrich Lumpert was not interrogated proves that the investigation was not carried out properly and therefore criminal handlings could be kept in the dark. Mebo concluds that somebody at RARDE must have put the fragment after the making of the scratch marks into the “Slalom shirt”. “Operation Sandwood” failed to investigate this important aspect.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 3
Edwin Bollier has been invited by Ms Watson - Principal Procurator Fiscal Depute - CROWN Lockerbie Trial Team Police for precognition in Scotland/Dumfries. (see letter dated .September 1999). He inspected the MST-13 fragment in presence of Ms Watson and Mr Harvey of the Criminal Investigation Team Crown and several police officers. They made handwritten notes into their separate official notebooks and at the end they signed two “Statements of witness”. Edwin Bollier concluded that the key piece of evidence was manipulated and requested that a witness must be called to verify the two different colours of the two fragment parts.

Officer ID Kate Thomson acted as a witness. Her task was to verify two the different colours of the two fragment parts. We assume that this respected officer was not colour-blind and confirmed the correct colours. (Large part of the fragment = green / Small part of the fragment = dark charred). She was not called as a witness at the Trial. A copy of the signed “Statements of witness” dated 16.9.1999 and 17.9.1999 was handed over to Edwin Bollier, but without the statement by witness ID Thomson. The statement of confirming of the different colours of the two fragments would have made clear that criminal manipulations of the fragments occurred.
An important question is what happened to the other larger dark charred original part (PT35a) of the fragment which was cut by Siemens and obviously exchanged by a green fragment part. Was it disposed of or is it still stored in the archive. Why they needed two different days to show the tiny fragments? Who made the very last sealing of the small glass tubes with the fragments, before handing it over to the Court?

We have reasons to believe that Operation Sandwood failed to investigate this crucial statement by ID Thomson. Did the Crown withhold the documents or had the Court access to the tree “Statement of witness”?

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 4

A secret kept document by the FBI laboratory / “SECRET” FBI Report No 262-23 – August 22nd,1990 “(not available at the trial) shows that Senior Investigation Officer Stuart Henderson purposely deceived the FBI by handing over a manipulated sample (green duplicate) of the MST-13 fragment. It was made with identical materials used by Thüring. Timer board materials like this were used to manufacture timers as delivered to Libya. Therefore it resulted in an identical comparison with the Togo-Timer and finally leads to the indictment of Libya. A comparison with the original PT35 fragment (as discovered by RARDE) would have shown a different result and without a chance to blame Libya. (Handmade prototype PT35 = dark charred colour and 8 layers of circuit board material / Serial machine-made MST-13 Timers = green and 9 layers of circuit board material).

If Operation Sandwood would have investigated this, it would have shown criminal handlings of investigators by deceiving the FBI Lab by not handing over the original fragment, as discovered by RARDE in a Slalom shirt and instead of giving them a manipulated sample (green duplicate).

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 5
Bupo officers Flückiger and Mr.Knaus (BUPO Swiss Federal Police/Swiss Intelligence Service) visited the MEBO Office latest 23rd March 1990. They showed to the Mebo owners Edwin Bollier and Erwin Meister a photo, which they said was made by the FBI. The picture showed a fragment. Edwin Bollier and Erwin Meister immediately made a statement that this fragment derives from a MEBO Timer called MST-13. The fragment they showed was allegedly found in the Lockerbie area. After a second look, the MEBO owners came to the conclusion that this fragment derived from a handmade MST-13 prototype and not from machine-made MST-13 timer as delivered to the Libyan military procurement.
Handmade prototypes have never been sold or given to the Libyans. This crucial information must have made them aware that with a handmade prototype MST-13 fragment it would be impossible to blame the Libyans for the bombing of the PanAM 103 over Lockerbie. An identical photo was signed in Zurich by Edwin Bollier. (on the verso of the picture). The photo was seen for the last time in an album of BUPO officer Flückiger in presence of a Scottish Police delegation in Zurich. Edwin Bollier and Erwin Meister asked to have a look at the crucial photo. Superintendent Gilchrist “ordered vigorously” that they are not allowed to have another look at this photo. Why was this photo suddenly so important? What did they need to hide? The photo was then handed over to Scottish Police. Later – the Swiss Federal Judge Mrs Soudan requested that the photo belongs into the Swiss files and must be returned.
Even after repeated requests by Mebo nothing happened. MEBO requested this picture as evidence for a Swiss court case. Several requests by lawyers have been ignored and the photo is still missing...

The “Operation Sandwood” failed to investigate the background of this crucial photo who could potentially reveal manipulations by forensic experts or other officials.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 6
The RARDE Report 181, dated May 12th, 1989 contains an additional manipulated page with manipulated dates. The original previously written page No 51 was “overwritten” with figure No 52 and showed the date May 15th, 1989. The accompanying photo and drawing showed a “black carbonized” fragment (PT35) on the additional page. Dr. Hayes described all this, at the Court, as “an unfathomable mystery”. One can conclude that this was a severe manipulation and deception, as only after the court several sources (FBI / BKA) revealed that the true discovery date of the fragment was January 12th – 20th, 1990. A fax dated 20th January 1990 by Allen Feraday to CIO Henderson (Detective Superintendant Ferrie) indicates as well that the fragment was discovered in January 1990.

Additionally, the Police Label No 168-PI’995 and Label DP’137, have been manipulated and overwritten by other dates. (see attachment No 20).Why Dr Hayes signed the Label? A Swiss graphologist recommended that it would be easy with today’s forensic tools to prove the manipulations on the Police Labels as well as the manipulated page 51/52. MEBO offered forensic support by Swiss experts. To make in a rush Polaroid photos by Allen Feraday – as mentioned in the questionable Memorandum dated 15.9.1989 / 10.9.1990 is implausible. Professional pictures made in a photo-studio existed since 12th February 1990. The photo-session was witnessed by Williamson and Harrover. (Single close-ups PT35b/DP 140 (prod.335/prod.1754).
If the discovery date would have been indeed in May 1989 or September 1989, why would Police Scotland have waited until February 1990 to go from Laboratory to Laboratory to find out who could be the manufacturer of the timer fragment? It all leads to the conclusion that the discovery of the fragment took place in January 1990. The name of manufacturer MEBO was at the latest known in autumn 1989 when an officer of BUPO Switzerland and a second person visited the MEBO Office. Why they contacted, already at this time, MEBO engineer Ulrich Lumpert, who constructed the MST-13 Timers and made at the laboratory in Zurich the 3 Scratch marks and the letter “M” in autumn 1989? Did “Intelligence Services” conceal their early knowledge about MEBO and the real discovery date from Police Scotland?

No findings around the “unfathomable mysteries and we suppose that Police Scotland did not attempt to make new forensic and graphology tests. Another fact that the investigation was not done properly and professionally.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 7
“Operation Sandwood” failed to carry out a new forensic examination of the original MST-13 fragment (PT35); the one allegedly found in the Lockerbie area and discovered at RARDE in a “Slalom shirt”. It must be the fragment on the photo with the red circle (see photo No.334), with the scratch marks and not a fabricated “control sample”!!! Latest forensic technology allows an examination on traces of explosives. The excuses by RARDE that the fragment is too small is ridiculous. Even a single hair can nowadays be examined. We are convinced that a new examination would have shown that the fragment which was presented to the Court was manipulated and that the original (PT35) fragment was not involved in the bombing of PanAm 103. MEBO offered assistance by swiss forensic experts.

By avoiding a new independent forensic examination of the original PT-35 fragment, Police Scotland allowed that manipulations of the fragment kept in the dark and covered up the criminal handlings of officials and forensic experts.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 8
After the Trial in Zeist, a document by the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (letter signed by Mr Peter Lehmann – Swiss Federal prosecutor and the Head of the department Mr Michael Lauber) shows that they handed over a MST-13 timer PC board to a US authority. We assume that this was the prototype PC board – illegally handed over by MEBO Engineer Ulrich Lumpert to a Swiss Bupo officer. It is unknown who received it in the USA and if it was used to fabricate a fragment. MEBO handed over a copy of the crucial Swiss letter to “Operation Sandwood” but the paper was ignored. Swiss authorities need to tell who in the USA received the PC board. An important question is if this board – delivered by the Swiss – is still in the untouched condition in an archive in the USA or UK and for what purpose it was used?

By ignoring such an important document by high ranked Swiss officials and not following up what for this PC board was used in the USA proves that the investigation was not properly conducted.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 9
Officials and experts lied under oath about the discovery date of the key piece of evidence – the MST-13 fragment (PT35). See also accusation No. 6. The Court finally accepted the date of May 12th, 1989. Only after the Court in Zeist several documents became available which stated that the discovery date of the fragment was not May 12th, 1989 but instead January 12th- - 20th , 1990. This date was documented in the Secret FBI Report No 262-23 and based on information by Scottish Police. This report was only declassified after the Trial. The January date was also written in a BKA Germany report Mai 1990. Detective Chief Inspector Gordon Ross Ferry informed BKA that the fragment was detected in January 1990. The question remains who told DCI Ferry and why this crucial information was not passed to the Judges at the Trial. The Fax correspondence 22.1.90 from Allen Feraday to Scottish Police as well indicates the January 1990 discovery date. This fax only came to light after the Lockerbie Trial. (see details). All this changes the shaky story of the fragment discovery and proves that officials and forensic expert lied under oath at the trial by giving false testimonials. They deceived the judges.

Police Scotland must have been aware that the discovery date of the fragment was January 1990 as documented by FBI and BKA documents and other papers. It shows that they regarded lies under oath not as a criminal offence and it confirms once more that the investigation was not properly conducted.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)



Accusation No. 10
Insp. Williamson gave the order at the Siemens Lab Munich/Germany to cut the Original fragment (PT35) into 2 (two) pieces. Did he have the competence to cut such an important piece of evidence? Did SIO Chief Henderson give the order to Insp. Williamson? The question arises because he tried to ask Henderson for permission to carry on with forensic examinations at Siemens. As he could not contact Henderson, all examinations have been stopped, but the fragment was already polished and cut into 2 pieces. In our view, it is a severe manipulation to cut a piece of key evidence into two parts without mandatory reasons. The scratch marks and the letter “M” made by engineer Lumpert were no longer visible at this time. This important characteristic identification sign on the original piece of key evidence was polished off. Was this made in Munich or possibly before in the UK. Was it careless handling or done purposely? The two officers went back to the UK. Why only two Scottish police officers – without professional forensic experience, were present at the cutting session in Munich and not forensic experts like Allen Feraday or other experts? This question was never answered...

The cutting of the fragment was forensically not necessary as all relevant tests and small sample takings have already before been carried out by several UK labs. A diagnostically conclusive sample from the top of the fragment was already cut off in the UK and allowed the identification of the board materials as well as the counting of the layers of fibreglass. UK labs would have also been able to perform the cutting into 2 parts.. There must have been another important reason for going abroad to Germany to cut the fragment into two (2) parts. The unanswered question is, if there was the intention to prepare the creation of a patchwork by combining green circuit board material with the small dark charred part of the original PT35 fragment.

Remember... Only timers with green circuit board materials have been sold by MEBO to Libya. Only with green circuit board materials, it was possible to blame Libya. The handmade prototypes had brownish circuit boards and were not suitable to indict Libya.

The real background of the cutting of the fragment into two (2) pieces was not re-investigated although MEBO requested this from “Operation Sandwood” as it would have brought to light severe manipulations by officials.

More details see: Documents (List of attachments)





LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Accusation No. 1:
01 Publication by Edwin Bollier: Result of „Operation Sandwood“ influenced SCCRC...

Accusation No. 2:
02 Confirmation by Ulrich Lumpert (Scratch marks on the fragment)
03 Confirmation by Ulrich Lumpert (SCCRC/Police Scotland/Swiss authorities)
04 Affidavit No 1 by Ulrich Lumpert , dated 3. Mai 2001
05 Affidavit No 2 by Ulrich Ulrich Lumpert, dated 18.July 2007
06 Photo No.329 (PP 8932/PI 9959 Fragment in red circle + enlarged picture of fragment
07 Video Transcript: Interview with Ulrich Lumpert

Accusation No. 3:
08 Handwritten Statement of Witness dated 16/9/99 by Dumfries and Galloway Const. + Transcript
09 Handwritten Statement of Witness dated 17/9/99 by Dumfries and Galloway Const. + Transcript
10 InfoGraphic (Sybol Graphic) : Fragments in Glasstubes as seen in Dumfries
11 My continous efforts to see the Original ST-13 fragment

Accusation No. 4:
12 Secret Report FBI No 262-23/Aug 22nd 1990 (declassified)
13 InfoGraphic: Evolution of the MST-13 fragments
14 Photo: Illustration 8 Layers of fibreglass = handmade prototype
15 Photo: Illustration 9 Layers of fibreglass = machine made MST-13

Accusation No. 5:
16 InfoGraphic: Missing photo
17 Photo: The curve makes the difference (Edwin Bollier with handsaw)
18 Letter Lawyer Mr.Marcel Bosonnet; request to show the original photo
19 Request by Mrs.Saudan to return photo

Accusation No. 6:
20 Picture: Police Label PI 995
21 Fax Memorandum: A.Feraday attn. Det.Sgt Ferrie /SIO Henderson dated 22.1.1990
22 Memorandum: A.Feraday to DI William Williamson dated 15.9.1989 / 10.9.1990
23 Court Transcript: Quote: Dr.Heyes “unfathomable mystery”...

Accusation No. 7:
No attachments

Accusation No. 8:
24 Document: Mr.Peter Lehmann/Mr.Michael Lauber: Timer part sent to US authorities...

Accusation No. 9:
25 Secret Report FBI No 262-23/Aug 22nd 1990 (declassified): Discovery date
26 Report by BKA Germany: Discovery date
27 Fax Memorandum: A.Feraday attn.Det.Sgt.Ferrie/SIO Henderson dated 22.1.1990 / Discovery date

Accusation No. 10
28 Photo of fragment: Siemens Germany (cut into two parts)

Additional Information
29 Letter to Police Scotland / Police Scotland Professional Standard Department
30 Letter to Police Scotland / Mr.Johnstone
31 Investigation Targets No.1
32 Investigation Targets No.2



PRELIMINARY REMARKS:

The main reason for the Criminal Complaint:

The investigation of “Operation Sandwood” was deliberately and wilfully not properly conducted and it resulted in preferential treatment of criminal handlings by officials and experts and thwarted the implementation of charges.


When Police Scotland announced that a special unit called “Operation Sandwood” would investigate into claims of criminality by investigators and prosecutors, who worked on the Lockerbie case. Their task was an investigation over allegations of perjury, evidence tampering and attempts to pervert the course of justice.
We welcomed this move as a step into the right direction. We had high hopes that the findings could restore justice in the Lockerbie case.

Therefore we decided to share our findings and some new evidence with “Operation Sandwood”. We sent them several documents about our investigation results including a detailed list of investigation targets. Unfortunately requests for a personal meeting in Scotland where refused or not answered.

Several times the delivery of the report was delayed and they always declared that it is in its final stage. It came as a shock when – after 4 years of investigation – Police Scotland announced that the conclusion was:
“No criminality” in the handling of Lockerbie bombing investigation... and there will be no criminal prosecution.”
The final report remains confidential and we had no access to it. Therefore our anger and frustration is based on the above public statement.
Aamer Anwar the solicitor representing the Megrahi family said they were “deeply disappointed” at the findings of “Operation Sandwood”.


Again we made an application to meet Police Scotland to discuss our view, backed with evidence and documents and why in our opinion the result of the final report is not acceptable. It was also important to inform them about decisive facts – to our knowledge - not known at the time of the Lockerbie Trial. A registered letter to the “Police Scotland Professional Standard Department” was unfortunately ignored and we never received a reply.

Especially the manipulations around the MST-13 (PT35) lead to a verdict to the detriment of Libya and Abdelbasset al-Megrahi and severely damaged the business of Mebo AG (Ltd). Without a doubt, officials and expert lied under oath at the Lockerbie Trial in Zeist/Holland. (see Official Court transcript)


We concluded that it is necessary to prepare and file an official “Criminal complaint against Police Scotland.” The Criminal Complaint contains 10 accusations and various documents.

We assume that the “carte blanche” report by “Operation Sandwood” influenced the SCCRC not to refer the possible ground for miscarriage of justice about the MST-13 Timer, to the High Court, to the disadvantage of Mebo Ltd, Abdelbasset al-Megrahi and Libya.

Remember: The ground about the MST-13 fragment was part of the appeal which was abandoned by Abdelbasset al-Megrahi.


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




24 April, 2021



About the Book
'The Lockerbie Bombing'



The destruction of Pan Am Flight 103 over the Scottish town of Lockerbie in December 1988 was the largest attack on Britain since World War Two. 259 passengers and 11 townsfolk of Lockerbie were murdered. Libyan Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was convicted of the crime. He maintained his innocence until his death in 2012.

Among the passengers was Flora, beloved daughter of Dr Jim Swire. Jim accepted American claims that Libya was responsible, but during the Lockerbie Trial he began to distrust key witnesses and supposed firm evidence. Since then it has been revealed that the USA paid millions of dollars to two central identification witnesses, and the only forensic evidence central to the prosecution has been discredited.

The book takes us along Dr. Swire’s journey as his initial grief and loss becomes a campaign to uncover the truth behind not only a personal tragedy but one of the modern world’s most shocking events.

Book nr. ISBN: 9781780276489

SAD ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMV6nVMSkYs



by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




8th April, 2021



The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, must also apply in the case of "Lockerbie/ PanAm103", AMEN...
LINK: https://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/2021/04/a-self-blinded-justice-system.html


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




5th April, 2021

Link from Patrick Haseldine > https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10223691933340576&set=a.1393926922424

JUSTICE FOR MEGRAHI AWAITS AT THE SUPREME COURT

Aamer Anwar & Co.
63 Carlton Place
GLASGOW
Scotland G5 9TW

4th April 2021

Dear Mr Anwar,

BACKGROUND
Five Scottish Judges have just refused Ali Abdelbaset al-Megrahi permission to take the posthumous appeal against his father's Lockerbie bombing conviction to the UK Supreme Court:

A written Judgment issued on 1 April 2021 by Lord Carloway, the Lord Justice General, said the court "has had some difficulty in understanding the exact nature of the challenge".

It said: "Although the case is clearly one of public importance, the proposed grounds of appeal do not raise points of law of general public importance.

"The principles of law which the court applied were all well known, settled and largely uncontroversial in the appeal.

"For these reasons, the court refuses permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court."

Megrahi's son Ali al-Megrahi, who has maintained his father’s innocence and is determined to fulfil the promise he made to clear his name and that of Libya, clearly cannot accept the Scots Appeal Court ruling.[1] He said:

"I have now instructed our legal team to seek leave to appeal directly to the UK Supreme Court which is the final court of appeal for my father's case.[2]

ARGUMENT
As Emeritus Professor of Lockerbie Studies, I have been closely monitoring all the developments in the Pan Am Flight 103 case that have unfolded since 21 December 1988. There is in my view only one ground of appeal which is likely to succeed in overturning Abdelbaset al-Megrahi's conviction in the UK Supreme Court, and his surname is Feraday:

Alan or Allen Feraday OBE (born 23 December 1937), former head of the Forensic Explosives Laboratory (FEL) at the Royal Armament Research and Development Establishment (RARDE) at Fort Halstead in Kent, is a self-professed forensic expert in electronics.[3]

Although not so academically qualified, Allen Feraday was often addressed as ‘Dr’ or ‘Professor’ when he appeared as a time bomb expert witness in a number of high profile terrorist bombing cases including Danny McNamee (1982), John Berry (1983), Patrick Magee (1984), Hassan Assali (1985), the Gibraltar shootings (March 1988) and the Lockerbie bombing (December 1988).[4]

Margaret Thatcher soon took an interest in Allen Feraday after his evidence in the 1986 Brighton bombing case where Patrick Magee was convicted, and was especially grateful for the exculpatory testimony Feraday gave at the "Death on the Rock" inquest in Gibraltar, when the SAS were alleged to have been operating a "shoot to kill" policy against three IRA bombers killed in March 1988.[5]

Following the sabotage of Pan Am Flight 103 on 21 December 1988, the director of the Forensic Explosives Laboratory (FEL) Dr Thomas Hayes and his colleague Allen Feraday were tasked with the forensic investigation into the Lockerbie bombing, which was allocated the FEL case reference number PP8932. In the 1989 Queen's Birthday Honours list, Feraday was awarded an OBE[6] and took over as head of the FEL when Hayes retired to become a chiropodist in the latter part of 1989. Two years later, Feraday and Dr Hayes (who continued with the Lockerbie investigation on a part-time basis) compiled a Joint Forensic Report into case PP8932. The JFR identified the only piece of hard evidence in the Lockerbie case, PT/35(b), a tiny fragment of printed circuit board that Feraday asserted had been the trigger for the Lockerbie bomb.[7]

On 28 September 1993, Allen Feraday’s career prospects suddenly appeared to be in tatters when, in overturning John Berry's conviction, England's most senior judge, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Taylor of Gosforth, commented that although Feraday's views were "no doubt honestly held", his evidence had been expressed in terms that were "dogmatic in the extreme" and his conclusions were "uncompromising and incriminating".[8] LCJ Taylor went even further saying that in future Feraday should not be allowed to present himself as an expert in the field of electronics.[9][10] In 1995, Allen Feraday saw the writing on the wall[11] and, aged 58, took early retirement after 25 years' service at the FEL when RARDE was subsumed into the less regal-sounding Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA).[12]

How come then the main prosecution 'expert' witness at the trial in June 2000 of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi – who was convicted in January 2001 of the Lockerbie bombing – was none other than Allen Feraday? The obvious answer is that Scots Law Professor Robert Black arranged for the Lockerbie trial to be held under Scottish Judges in the Netherlands, where Feraday's ban imposed by the now-deceased English Law Lord could safely be ignored.[13]

Colin Boyd, Baron Boyd of Duncansby, was Lord Advocate for Scotland when the Lockerbie trial began in May 2000 so must have been fully aware that his star prosecution witness, Allen Feraday, had been banned from giving evidence by Lord Chief Justice Lord Taylor seven years earlier. It is interesting to note from Colin Boyd's Lockerbie Official Narrative that he credits Allen Feraday with identifying "a piece of circuitry no larger than a fingernail" as "identical to circuitry from an MST-13 timer." And that Feraday's June 1990 identification was made "with the assistance ultimately of the CIA and FBI."

However, the FBI's Tom Thurman has always maintained that he was the one who actually identified the MEBO timer fragment. So why wasn't Tom Thurman called as a prosecution witness? Well in 1997, as a result of a review by the US Inspector General, Michael Bromwich, Tom Thurman was barred from FBI scientific investigations and from being called as an expert witness. Bromwich had discovered that Thurman had no formal scientific qualifications and that he had been "circumventing procedures and protocols, testifying to areas of expertise that he had no qualifications in . . . therefore fabricating evidence."[14] Not surprising therefore that Tom Thurman was not called to give evidence about the timer fragment at the Lockerbie trial at Camp Zeist.

In the 2009 documentary film "Lockerbie Revisited", which was broadcast in the Netherlands on the eve of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi's second appeal against conviction for the Lockerbie bombing that started at the High Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh on 28 April 2009, the FBI's Richard Marquise was asked "Would you have a case if you wouldn't have this [timer fragment] evidence?"

Marquise replied:

"Would we have a case...it would be a very difficult case to prove...this helps our link. Without the timer fragment we would have been unable to develop additional evidence against Libya. I don't think we would ever have had an indictment."[15]

RECOMMENDATION
My recommendation, Mr Anwar, is that you appeal to the UK/Supreme Court to quash the Scottish Court in the Netherlands' 2001 conviction of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi on the basis of fabricated timer fragment evidence led by the "non-expert witness" Allen Feraday.

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Haseldine

(Emeritus Professor of Lockerbie Studies)

POSTSCRIPT
PS. Once the conviction is overturned and Justice for Megrahi is finally achieved, I should be most grateful if you would support my petition "Why doesn't Scotland Yard launch a Bernt Carlsson murder inquiry?"

REFERENCES
1. "Al-Megrahi family 'devastated' as Lockerbie appeal court judges uphold conviction"
2. "Judges reject Lockerbie bomber family's bid to appeal to UK's highest court"
3. "The Forensic Files (part 1)"
4. "Allen W Feraday OBE"
5. "'Gibraltar', a New Play: a Look at 'Death On The Rock' 25 Years On"
6. "ORDER OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE (Civil Division) OFFICERS (OBE) Allen William Feraday, Principal Scientific Officer"
7. "So could the Lockerbie bomber be freed next? These three men have had their convictions quashed. In each instance the same expert's testimony helped secure the prosecution's case, which was later challenged."
8. "Law Report: Powers of appeal should be clarified: Regina v Berry - Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (Lord Taylor of Gosforth, Lord Chief Justice, Mr Justice Otton and Mr Justice Kay), 28 September 1993"
9. "'Doubts' over Lockerbie evidence"
10. "Evidence that casts doubt on who brought down Flight 103"
11. "R v Berry (No.3) [1995] 1 WLR 7"
12. "Introducing Allen Feraday"
13. "June 13th 2000 Testimony of Allen Feraday"
14. "The Framing of al-Megrahi"
15. "Extract from 2009 TV documentary 'Lockerbie Revisited'"







WITNESS: number 579, HANS BROSAMLE, sworn
Q - Mr. Brosamle, are you Hans Brosamle?.
A - Officially it's Johannes Brosamle.
Q - Do you work for the Siemens AG company?
A - I worked. I am retired now.
Q - Thank you. What type of work did the Siemens Company carry cut?
A - Nearly everything in the electronic technique. Nuclear power plants, down to small semi-conductors, medical equipment, telecommunication, automotive, automation.
Q - Okay. So a company with wide experience in --
A - Yes.
Q -- the electronics industry?
A - Yes.
Q - And would that include experience of printed circuit boards??
A - Yes. That was the subject where Iworinclude experience of printed circuit boards?
Q - Thank you. In 1990, were you visited by police officers from Scotland?
A - Yes.
Q - And did they have with them a fragment from a printed circuit board
A - Yes.
Q - And did they ask you to examine it?
A - Yes.
Q - In order to assist the police with the examination, did you require to remove a section from the fragment?
A - Yes.
Q - Would you look for me firstly at Label 419. Now, do you have before you a small part of a fragment, Mr. --
A - Yes. I see my signature here.
++++
The criminal history of a dark charred MST13 timer fragment (PT35) to a green coloured MST13 timer fragment (PT35/B) for the positive forensic comparison with a MST13 timer delivered to Libya (TOGO timer (K1); stay tuned...




A «Criminal Complaint against Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood)» is still pending. MEBO requests full transparency concerning the statement of an important Police witness. Was former Assistant Chief Constable Kate Thomson interviewed by «Operation Sandwood»?

Edwin Bollier had the opportunity to finally inspect the MST-13 fragment in 1999 at the HQ of Police Dumfries and Galloway. He was invited by the CROWN OFFICE. After the meetings, he (Bollier) requested a witness to verify the colours of the fragments. Former Assistant Chief Constable Kate Thomson had a close look at the fragments, but she was not allowed to say which colours she saw. Edwin Bollier is convinced – assuming she is not colour-blind - that she saw a large green coloured fragment and a small dark burnt fragment. Her statement as a witness at the Lockerbie Court would have been crucial, but she was not invited…

During the court in Zeist Edwin Bollier had the chance to meet Procurator Mirian Watson during a coffee break. She confirmed that the statement by police witness Kate Thomson was recorded in writing. MEBO received two detailed statements about the meeting in Dumfries but never a statement by witness Kate Thomson…

To our knowledge, the judges were not aware of the two „Statements of Witness“ in Dumfries and the additional statement by Kate Thomson.

Available statements > see http://www.lockerbie.ch/mebo/mebo1-9-dok730.html

After the conversation with Procurator Mirian Watson, Edwin Bollier intended to ask the judge to invite Kate Thomson as a witness. Unfortunately, it was not possible anymore as a further question was denied.

Quote: (Court transcript):
LORD SUTHERLAND: „Thank you, Mr Bollier. That's all.“
A: (Edwin Bollier): My Lord, may I put a question? Am I allowed to do that?
LORD SUTHERLAND: I think not Mr Bollier. Your evidence is now over, and that is all we can hear.
+++
MEBO requests now access to the full statement by Kate Thomson.(Police Scotland)







MEBO proclaims: The truth is the most precious thing in the world and also applies to the clarification of the decisive, Scottish evidence fraud in the Lockerbie-PanAm103 case, to the detriment against LIBYEN and Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi....

Criminal law specialist Aamar Anwar: “I have no doubt that the new democratic Libyan government headed by Abdul Hamid Dabaiba will support the final appeal for justice on behalf of the al-Megrahi family and help in our efforts to prove the innocence of Libya and its people.”






Lockerbie/PanAm 103 - The biggest evidence fraud in the history of Scotland !
So far, we have not been contacted by the Crown Office unit... (including Lord Advocate Mr James Wolffe QC).
We would like to know about the planning of the next judical steps and timeframe to pursue the "Criminal complaint".
Why is the handling of the crucial Criminal Complaint against 'Police Scotland' (Operation SANDWOOD), filed on November 11th, 2020 by MEBO LTD & Edwin Bollier's correspondence lawyer Dr. Dieter Neupert, at the Crown Office - for qualified evidence fraud involving a crucial MST13 timer fragment (PT35) - continuing to be delayed?
Around the Scottish evidence fraud in the "Lockerbie/Pan Am 103 case", there is a clear exculpatory evidence in favor of LIBYA and Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi; which until today, is obviously repulsed by delaying tactics and Scottish "scurrilities".

Edwin Bollier & MEBO LTD, are thorough and fair in their approach to expose the truth cover-up in the questionable Scottish Justice ruling in 2000/01 - against Libya.

The criminal investigation into "evidence fraud" - against Police Scotland - in the "Lockerbie case Panam103", must also be examined by the UN.
Don't forget: The UN has supported the indictment of LIBYA - in the "Lockerbie case, PanAm 103" - against LIBYA....


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




1 February, 2021

A special part of the Scottish police and judiciary ("brotherhood") which has been involved in the search for the truth in the "Lockerbie/ PanAm103 case" is afraid, since the first to the third appeal, until today of the evidence fraud with the MST13 timer fragment PT35, PT35/B, - more than the devil fears the holy water.

Both "brotherhoods" involved were able to present a wonderful gift to the Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary, at the last moment, shortly before the third Appeal, by a deliberately false conclusion of the report by the “Operation Sandwood”.

After 4 years of investigation by Police Scotland, they whitewashed their staff. Police Scotland's "Operation Sandwood", came to the mendacious conclusion that no criminal facts were found by its officers in connection with the "PanAm 103 bombing"investigation.
This allowed the Scottish Appeal Court to exclude the most important point in the Grounds of Review – 5/a – the MST-13 timer fragment PT35. This judicial trick leads to an unjustified verdict against Libya, Abdelbasset al-Megrahi and the detriment of MEBO.

The "CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST POLICE SCOTLAND; LOCKERBIE BOMBING PANAM 103, ("OPERATION SANDWOOD") is still ongoing.


LINK: Lockerbie Third Appeal — Judges uphold guilty verdict

and Lockerbie – Three Decades of Lies: J’Accuse…!


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




15 January, 2021

Only with Evidence Fraud orchestrated by officials around Police Scotland, using MST13 timer material - could implicate LIBYA and Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, in the "Lockerbie affair PanAm103".

Only one fact can bring down the foundation of lies in the "Lockerbie affair PanAm103", namely with the 100% fact of the Scottish evidence fraud, with the MST13 timer fragments PT35 /PT35/b PT35/B - which was deliberately spun off u.a.before the appeal began! SHAME!

Fortunately, since early December 2020, through Edwin Bollier & MEBO Ltd's solicitor, Dr Dieter Neupert, the "CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST POLICE SCOTLAND;

LOCKERBIE BOMBING PANAM 103, ("OPERATION SANDWOOD") has been ongoing at CROWN OFFICE Edinburgh EH1 1LA.

LINK:

Lockerbie Third Appeal — Judges uphold guilty verdict
and
Lockerbie – Three Decades of Lies: J’Accuse…!



by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland




1 January, 2021



Film LINK > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZGTT3A8s-I


The new suspect in the "Lockerbie affair PanAm103"
Agila Mohammad MASUD, needs to be interrogated in a neutral place


This politically tinged "Christmas treat" about the "Lockerbie SAGA" - excellent and impressive announced by outgoing US Attorney General William Barr, on 32nd anniversary of the airline bombing, flight PanAm103, that killed 270 people - was hopefully his last possible "Cover-up" (LIE) in his life...

If, according to William Barr, as early as 1991, Agila Mohammad MASUD, was suspected of being the bomb-maker in the "Lockerbie case", why was he not at least listed and call up 2000/01, as a witness in the "Lockerbie trial"? There were several questions about MASUD at the Court in Zeist... (see Court transcript).

This new "decade" against LIBYA was started by the questionable video film "My Brother’s Bomber", by Ken Dornstein, USA.

It is respectful - that a brother who lost his brother in an assassination attempt - tries to find the real perpetrators and background of the assassination attempt on PanAm103; but what Mr Ken was trying to do with his mostly, provable LIES > in the "soft- and hardware" description, is extremely perfidious and nasty.!

Ken was personally at important places and addresses which appear in the"Lockerbie Saga", so at Dr Jim Swire home in Scotland, at MEBO/Edwin Bollier, in Switzerland, in Malta, BERLIN, Tripoli LIBYA, etc...

When Ken came to MEBO AG in Zurich for 2-3 days with his team, he was generously and comprehensively presented by Edwin Bollier, through software and hardware, with our evidence against the UK & USA Indictment - i.e. in favour of LIBYA and Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - for examination.

Ken was informed at MEBO how Badri Hassan, with his company ABH, haddeliberate implicated Mr Al Megrahi in the "Lockerbie disaster" etc.In order to appear convincing and serious, in Ken's film "My Brother’s Bomber",his allegation scenes were "coated" to 90% with correct media film reports around the 'Lockerbie Tragedy'; rest 10% highly questionable and defamatory!

As the Libyan Minister of Interior demands the formation of a "legal-political" team to defend LIBYA in the newly opened "Lockerbie case". We hope that the accused Agila Mohammad MASUD, can come to a neutral court interrogation e.g. at UN in Geneva/Switzerland, in the presence of USA and UK officials & judges.

He should have the possibility to comment - neutrally without influence - about the accusations that he is the bomb maker in the "Lockerbie case". The following decisive facts can already today be demonstrably set against Ken's and the, legally valid Scottish circumstantial verdict:

1.) False testimony of official witnesses under oath: No "dark charred " MST13 Timer Circuit Board, (PT35) was found or discovered on May 12, 1989; all further facts in this context can be proven today as "Scottish Evidence Fraud and LIE's" (Soft- & Hardware Evidence Fraud).
(Perjury Act 1911 CHAPTER 61 and 2Geo 5)

2.) Although Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, was in Malta on 7th December 1988, Al Megrahi cannot be verified as a clothes buyer - who according to Tony Gauci's claim (court testimony, 2000/01, sworn) - bought various clothes on the same day 7/12/1988, at his boutique "Mary's House"!
Today it is proven that the unknown "clothes buyer" visited Tony Gauci on December 23, 1988, and bought clothes; important: Al Megrahi, was not in Malta on this date 23/12/1988 (Police confirmation)

3.) There is no proof that Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - only because of the intelligence passport, with alias name under "Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad" - with the real photo of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - had anything to do with an "IED bomb case" or the clothes purchase at Gauci.
The double passport was used for other intelligence operations. Al Megrahi produced the "alias passport" early during questioning and personally brought the passport to court after in "The Hague" in 1998.

4.) There is no real circumstantial evidence that the bomb suitcase was transported from Malta via Frankfurt to Heathrow and loaded onto flight PA'103 to New York....
On the basis of suspicions an alternative scenario must be investigated about passenger (Mougrabi) and the transport of a possible bomb suitcase - from Cyprus, with flight CY'1364, Cyprus Airways, to Heathrow on 21 December 1988, and reloaded onto PanAm'103. There was talk about the “Cyprus connection” at the Court, but the further travel destination of Mr Mougrabi or his stay in London, remains in the dark.

5.) MEBO Investigation Result: Mr Abdelbasset Al Megrahi, as well as a MEBO MST-13 timer fragment (PT35, PT35/b, PT35/B) and a Toshiba Radiorecorder (RT-8016-SF16) have nothing to do with the "Lockerbie Affair / PanAm103"; will soon be proven by the ongoing Appeal or the Criminal Complaint, filed by MEBO, against Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood) and could be costly for Mr Ken, because he is also responsible for creating considerable reputational damage to the detriment of MEBO Ltd & Edwin Bollier and Others.

Summary: MEBO thinks that the Lockerbie-disaster has been abused to conspire against LIBYA and has used the firm MEBO ltd., as its link. Lockerbie could become a "hot potato" for Ken and Attorney William Barr.

It is highly important that Agila Mohammad MASUD, can come to a court interrogation in a neutral location e.g. UN (United Nations) Geneva/Switzerland

The further search for the real culprits must be directed in another direction!

LINK: https://gosint.wordpress.com/lockerbie-three-decades

and > https://www.bitchute.com/video/qTzisla5E9qv/?fbclid

and > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaT_L4kfy0U&t=2506s

and > https://www.facebook.com


by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland