Back



Further evidence was falsified to implicate Libya in the PanAm-103 bomb plot.

Why was the Toshiba radio manual shown to Decky Horton at Kamp van Zeist different from the original Toshiba radio manual found by the Hortons? Is it proof of a conspiracy?

Answer from MEBO Ltd:

Why to witness Decky Horten at the court in Kamp van Zeist were shown as evidence only some paper fragments of a Toshiba radio recorder manual, RT-8016-SF16 BomBeat? There is a logical explanation.

These paper fragments, did not descend from the Toshiba manual found by Decky Horton in Lockerbie; why?
The Toshiba manual found by Decky Horten was not belonging to a Toshiba radiorecorder type ever supplied to Libya by Toshiba!

The Toshiba manual found by Goeff and Decky Horton was undestroyed and was found together with a radio recorder fragment (AG/145). This proves that this fragment did not originate from an explosion, but was placed there deliberately with other pieces of evidence (PT-35; a;b;c;d)! This explains also why the fragment (AG/145) has never been tested for explosive residues by Dr. Hayes!

Thus was clear, in order to entangle Libya into the PanAm-103 assassination attempt, as proof, paper fragments of a Toshiba radio recorder manual were used, which descended from a Toshiba equipment delivered to Libya.

"What a coincidence", these paper fragments, sheet, no.1 to 5 were found together with the alleged PT-35 timer fragment (MST-13) and had been specified by chiropodist and "expert" Dr. Thomas Hayes (RARDE) in Ford Halstead on its manipulated auxiliary side no. 51 in his Examination Rapport of the 12th of May 1989 …

It is provable that the manipulated side no. 51, was later used by Dr. Hayes. The original sides numbers, 51 to 55, were overwritten by Dr. Hayes with no. 52 to 56!
The paper fragments from a exchanged wrong Toshiba manual were needed to proof the conspiracy against Libya.

The manipulated police label PI-995



Various debris including a multilayered fragment of white paper from a Toshiba radiorecorder manual was registered on original police label no. PI-95 from 17/01/1989.

Under discription of the article was originally written: cloths (charred).

After the manipulation of (PI-95) the new designation was PI-995 with the same date, 17th of January 1989. The text of the discription of the article was changed into debris (charred).
Important:
The police-label with the manipulated designation PI-995 was misused by Dr. Hayes in his falsified and additionally added EXAMINATION page no. 51!

For remembrance: On the falsified page No. 51 from the 12th of May 1989 Dr. Hayes noted under designation of material:
PT-35,(b) a fragment of a green coloured circuit board.

Deliberately and wrongly the fragment PT-35 was described as a green MST-13 timer fragment. Because the PT-35 fragment was provably delievered to RARDE on the 17th of Januar 1989, it must be the green fragment AG/145 of a Toshiba radiorecorder, not the fragment of a MST-13 timer fragment. The fraud is perfect.

(Section 6 in the RARDE Report 181, "Concealment of IED Radio" sides 106-107 show, that the belatedly indentified Toshiba radio-fragment Prod. AG/145 was allegedly found midth of January 1989 in the container AVE 4041 PA from the debris of Boeing 747 by Crown investigators - and was brought to RARDE for forensic examinations on the 17th of Januar 1989 (Section 6.2.1).

The pictures of evidence of the Crown Office (Lockerbie Trial Images) Image 9, (PP'8932 und PI/995) are provably manipulated ones. Why:
On the original picture PI/95 the green fragment AG/145 of a Toshiba radiorecorder was depicted (red circle).
After the manipulation the green Toshiba fragment AG/145 was replaced by the brown MST-13 timer fragment PT-35 with the letter "M" scratched in (red circle).

See the Police Label no. PI-995 evidence pictures appendices.

by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd
+++

The story:
Lockerbie evidence called into question
Aug 31 2008 by Ian Robson, Sunday Sun A COUPLE have revealed how they were caught up in a conspiracy theory over the Lockerbie plane crash.
Geoff and Decky Horton found a key piece of evidence after wreckage was strewn over their farm, located 60 miles from the crash site.
But the piece of paper — believed to be from the package which contained the bomb that blew up Pan Am Flight 103 — was damaged after it was handed over to investigators.
In a TV documentary to be shown today, conspiracy buffs claim the evidence was tampered with.
Geoff and Decky, of Morpeth, Northumberland, are interviewed in the BBC2 programme The Conspiracy Files: Lockerbie.
The documentary highlights several theories about the tragedy which claimed the lives of 270 people almost 20 years ago in December 1988.
Geoff tells the programme: "On the night in question there was a strong gale, about 90 miles per hour, and the wreckage from Lockerbie was spread right across the North Sea."
"We were finding Christmas cards written by the bairns on board, letters, personal effects, things like that. Quite harrowing."
Decky said she found part of a radio cassette manual with the word Toshiba clearly visible.
She later gave evidence at the trial of the Libyan man accused of the terrorist attack, but the evidence bag she was shown contained several pieces of paper.
She said: "It was in one piece when I found it but in the bag there were several pieces and the name Toshiba was only just discernable by then."
"When I found the piece of paper it was more or less intact, a bit tatty round the edges, but it definitely had Toshiba written across it."
Police said the paper was damaged following a battery of forensic tests.
But the documentary says: "Why was the piece of paper so altered from when the Hortons found it?"
"Was it proof of a conspiracy or careless handling by the police? The mystery remains."
Conspiracy theorists believe key evidence was tampered with to implicate Libya in the bomb plot. The documentary also mentions several other theories, including allegations of involvement by rogue American spies.
It includes an interview with Siaf Al Islam Al Gaddafi, son of the Libyan leader, who attacks the families of victims for seeking compensation.
He claims Libya only accepted responsibility to end international sanctions.
The show says Libyan national Abdelbaset Al Megrahi’s conviction for mass murder was controversial.
And it has a rare interview with Ahmed Jibril, leader of a Palestinian faction, who was an early suspect in the investigation.




Back