The MST-13 timer fragment ist the clue in the Lockerbie-case

Was the Lockerbie-affair the beginning of an undeclared war against Libya?

MEBO/Bollier asks with the support of a Sottisch lawyer again for international legal assistance from Switzerland to prove definitely by means of a forensic expertise in the presence of police experts from Switzerland and engineer U. Lumpert that the MST-13 timer fragment was fabricated through Scottish officials and was in addition manipulated.

1. Question:

Why did the Swiss Federal Police (Ex-BUPO) went to see Erwin Meister und Edwin Bollier from MeBo Ltd in April 1990 with a polaroid picture from FBI showing the timer fragment no. PT/35?

Answer:

Because at that time BUPO had received all adresses and technical features about the MST-13 timer from the FBI. Further on the BUPO was at least since June 1989 in contact with our ex-engineer Ulrich Lumpert without our knowing.

FBI forensic expert Thomas Thurman was since 1988 in possession of at least two MST-13 timers delivered to Libya and exlosives "Semtex-H". This two timers were handed over to the FBI by the CIA via "the headquarters of alcohol, tabacco and firearms". The timers plus explosives, firearms ammunition and other samples of Libyan military equipment had fallen into the hands of the CIA in Dakar (Senegal) und Lome (Togo).

This shows clearly that also other states through deliveries of Libyan military equipment were in possession of MST-13 timers!

In the run of the criminal investigations in the Lockebie-Affair the Swiss Federal Police (BUPO) in April 1990 showed FBI-Polaroid-Fotos of a fragment of an electronic board to the owners of MEBO Ltd (Erwin Meister and Edwin Bollier).

Edwin Bollier understood quickly, that the pictures showed a fragment of a MST-13 timer PC-board fabricated by MEBO.

At a close inspection Bollier noticed an important detail that the PC-board originated from a handmade Prototype and  that it was fabricated from a non-functioning MST-13 timer. Therefore it could not originate from an IDE (Improvised Explosive Device).

After further interviews through FBI-Officials and officers of the Scottish Police in Zurich and after Bollier’s visites in 1991 at the FBI in Washington and at the Scottish Police in Glasgow he understood clearly: The allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment in Lockerbie was a manipulated piece of evidence with the intention to link the state of Libya with the Lockerbie-atrocity.

In 1991 Bollier was invited to the FBI Headquarter in Wahington and Commissioner Richard Marquise offered him up to 4 million US$ and a new identity in the States if he would confirm in a police statement that the allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment originated from one of the 20 timers delivered to Libya between 1985 und 1986.

Now there was no more doubt for Bollier that a huge conspiracy against Libya was on the way.

Contrary to the Libyan crown witness against Libya, Abdul Jiacha, - an agent in the sold of the CIA – Bollier rejected the offer. Jiacha is currently living in the USA under a new identity.

After BUPO’s visit at MEBO in 1990 at the latest Thomas Thurmann knew through the picture identification of MEBO that the allegedly in Lockerbie found timer fragment with the police no. PT/35 did not originate from a "Libyan" timer, neither from a functioning MST-13 timer. Later T. Thurman was fired after a police investigation for having falsified evidence in other criminal cases.

Now FBI expert Thurman had a problem to incriminate Libya because he hadn’t expected that MEBO would be aware of the machinations around the MST-13 timer.

After the wrong accusation that linked Libya with the MST-13 timer fragment to the Lockerbie bombing was publicly announced on the 14th/15th of November 1991, the MST-13 timer fragment shown on picture no. PT/35 had to be changed and fabricated the way it would fit into the accusation against Libya.

Beetween Bollier’s expert opinion on the MST-13 timer fragment no. PT/35(b) und no. DP/31 on the 13th of September 1999 in the office of Procurator Miriam Watson in Dumfries (see police report) and his testimony in Kamp Zeist the fragment DP/31 had been burned in a way to make it impossible to recognize its colour!

During the trial at Kamp Zeist the Lord adocate refused to respond on any further question from Bollier concerning the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment ...

+++

2. Question

Who gave instructions to the BUPO to get a handmade MST-13 PC-board (prototyp) from U. Lumpert, ex-Eng. MEBO Ltd, and keep it?

Antwort:

Instructions from ##### crypto encode.

3. Questions

Why they asked for a brown MST-13 PC-board and not a green machine made one from "Thüring" which had been used for the fabrication of 20 timers deliverd to Libya? This question is important because Bollier had testified at a police investigation early in 1990 that the timers had only been delivered to Libya. Bollier had forgotten at this first interrogation that the had delivered in 1985 two MST-13 timer prototyps as samples to the STASI.

Was it because the MST-13 Fragment initially should not be brought in connection to Libya?

I come to this conclusion because the investigations of BUPO, FBI, BKA and the Scottish Police until the beginning of 1993 did not query Edwin Bollier (MEBO) concerning the delivey of 2 pieces of MST-13 timers (prototyps) to the East German STASI in 1985.

The investigators were since 1990 informed by Ulrich Lumpert that Edwin Bollier had brought the first two MST-13 Timer prototyps to the GDR in 1985.

Answer:

All these machinations at that time to determine the responsibles for the attack on PanAm 103 and today’s shifting back to PFLC-GC confirm that from the beginning a double strategy was planned.

From insider information it can be concluded that at "the right time" Meister & Bollier (MeBo) should be surprised with the fact that the STASI was in possession of two functionning and handmade MST-13 timers (prototyps) from MEBO. These timers allegedly were given to the general command of the PFLC (Jibril Ahmad) in Syria.

The PFLP allegedly brought down PanAm 103 by order of a third country ##### for the sum of 10 mio US$. Therefore a handmade MST-13 timer fragment from a prototyp was needed.

Here we find the answer why the investigators kept silent until Oktober 1993 and did not query MEBO about the fact that the STASI was in possession of two such timers.

(For recall: U. Lumpert had at the latest in 1990 given testimony of the delivery of two pieces of prototyps MST-13 Timer to the STASI in 1985 to the investigation authorities)

Nota bene
The defence of Abdelbaset al Megrahi, QC Taylor used the PFLP-theory at the trial in Kamp van Zeist (2000) to convince the prosecution of the involvement of an other country in the attack. The prosecution did not follow Duff&Taylor because the defence could not deliver the promised secret documents concerning the PFLP.

For that purpose a MST-13 timer fragment was needed that originated from a handmade prototyp.

Today it can be proved that these two timers delivered to the ITU in Bernau were not involved into the bombing of PanAm103.

Because of financial concurrence* between the defense team (Duff&Taylor) and MEBO Duff&Taylor for egoistic motifs sabotaged the strong exonerate evidence of witness E. Bollier and presented him before the trial as a "liar" who fantasizes and intends to mislead the prosecution.

*Libya had offered at that time a success honorarium of USD 200 mio for a positive result in the process against Libya and Megrahi.

Influenced by that caracter assassination of E. Bollier from QC Taylor the very clear exonerate evidence for Libya and his official Abdelbaset el Megrahi was judged as untrustworthy and was neglected reclessly.

All this to the disadvantage of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi and Libya.

DUFF & Taylor did such loose the original process and the first appeal. QC Taylor found his resting-place as a member of the SCCR-Commission, hopefully not as reward for his good collaboration with the prosecution.

Already before the beginning of the first Irak war (1990/91) - for well known political motifs - the USA and Great Britain made perfid and "nearly perfect" preparations to incriminate Libya fort he attack PanAm103 ...

4.) After a discussion between Bollier and Lumpert in Oktober 1993 and after revision of delivery bills and invoices to the GDR Bollier remembered that the Institute for Technical Investigations (ITU) in Bernau had after a test period kept the two MST-13 prototyps and that these timers had been invoiced together with other deliveries of timers from various providers.

The investigators were informed of these facts by E. Bolier in 1993 but seemingly didn't appear much surprised. (Because they already knew.)

5.) E. Bollier had always thought that U. Lumpert had only made two pieces of MST-13 timer PC-boards (prototyps) by hand; - that he actually had fabricated 3 pieces of MST-13 PC-boards, Bollier came to know only in 1993 by having insight into the police protocols (1990) of Lumpert's statements!

U. Lumpert in his affidavit from the 18th of July 2007 confirms that he had given wrong evidence at the trial in Kamp van Zeist when he was stating in Kamp van Zeist that he had broken one MST-13 timer PC-board and thrown it away.

The question if Engineer Lumpert was "recommended" to give this wrong evidence is still open.

He rivised his wrong statement in the affidavit and confirmed that he had given the third MST-13 PC-board on the 22th of June 1989* to an official investigator. This date * correponds with the statement the official investigator had given at the trial in in Kamp van Zeist (2000).

After studying all available records one has to raise seriousely the question whether the third MST-13 PC-board which was used for the timer fragment (PT/35) in the Lockerbie-case was fabricated by U. Lumpert on command in 1989?

Was the Lockerbie-affair the beginning of an undeclared war against Libya?


Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier-Tavakoli

+++

Link: The truth behind Lockerbie: http://www.alarabiya.net/views/2008/03/27/47511.html