>>> back to the info-start-page




NEWS | Archives A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H


The PanAm 103 Air-Disaster

LOCKERBIE 2016

Link to UTA 772 aircrash

Sure 1

In the Name of Allah, the most Compassionate, the most Merciful


See here the interview of Ex-engineer U. Lumpert
Film-Link to ITV "News at Ten":
http://blip.tv/file/1214012

See the film of BBC Two: The Conspiracy Files: Lockerbie
Link: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/25972/BBC_The_Conspiracy_Files___Lockerbie/

See the Introductory video in english Link: Click here
(Archive, ABC, BBC Television, Border Television ITN & NBC, A Just Dispatches, Just Television Production for Channel Four Television)


Attention: You must install the computer programme Microsoft Silverlight before
you can watched these secret Video-Dokcumentary - for criminal investigation !
Microsoft Silverlight

Please watch now the full documentary film "Lockerbie revisited" by Regisseur Gideon Levy, shown to Scottish members of Parliament about important facts concerning the conspiracy against Libya.

http://www.newyorkfestivals.com/winners/2011/pieces.php?iid=412747&pid=1

LOCKERBIE: Case Closed

The whole documentary by
ALJAZEERA:
New evidence casts doubt in Lockerbie case and proves the timer did not come from Libya !



AANGIRFAN : Lockerbie-Evidence

Please look the film document "The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie"
to your forming of an opinionon on:
http://www.archive.org/details/The-Maltese-Double-Cross

Switzerland, March 8, 2009

Megrahi's verdict is a spectacular miscarriage of Justice!

The Mebo investigation disclose: Not Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi was the Libyan buyer of clothes by Tony Gauci (Boutique Mary's House) on 7th December, but after indications, on 23th November 1988, 18:45 clock, the Libyan secret service defector for the CIA, Abdul Magjid Giaka was the buyer!
Why police officer Harry Bell had not show the photo-portrait (Q13 of Giaka) to Gauci ? Was Gauci paid for this dirty thing ?

(see photo Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14 on Gauci/Malta-report)

Magjid Giaka alias "Puzzlepiece", was not a "Shirker" and a "Liar" as the FBI tries to put him today, it was according to the CIA cables and other indications, the central man at Malta, in the conspiracy against Libya and its orders stand still under national security!

After the PanAm 103 tragedy, it is disclosed in one of the classified cables, Giaka was under pressure from his customer to get additional indication of events against Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Lamin Khalifah Fhimah, inside the Libyan Arab Airlines station at Luqa Airport, before 21th December 1988. Giaka had get the order for the clothes purchase, on 6th November 1988. This meeting was held in safe house at Malta. Another meeting was at 5th December, before Abdelbaset al Megrahi arrived on 7th December in Malta and a meeting was on 20th December 1988, the day before the Lockerbie-tragedy!

Before was published the US/UK Indictment against the Libyan official Fhimah and Megrahi, on 14th/15th November 1991, a further determining US meeting with Giaka took place. On 14th September 1991 Giaka left the Maltese shores unofficially by US boat and transferred to the USS Navy Vessel "Butte" (T-AE 27), 27 miles away from Malta at 36.10'N 14.38'E. On the ship there were special agent Philip Reid, FBI official Harold Hendershot and Nicholas H****, Arabic language interpreter and he enters the witness protection program as witness no. 684 with his wife already safely in London.

The official date given when Giaka joined the witness protection programme in the United States is the 3th December 1992. From official records until October 1999 the US Justice Department spend US$324,000 in connection with Giaka, accommodation, travelling, etc. A code used on Giaka's form regarding the witness protection programme is "Puzzle Piece" WF 140440.

Giaka in his statement told the investigators that once in October or November or December 1988 (not on 20th/21th December), he saw Fhima and Megrahi with two others taking two luggage form the converter, and have not given the luggage to be inspected by the customs officials. One of them was a large Samsonite, hard-sided suitcase. Giaka says it was unusal for Fhimah to take luggage without being inspected by customs officials.


Switzerland, March 7, 2009

The appeal, due to begin on April 27, 2009 could accelerate
the judgment after hearing just decisive parts of the appeal,
acoording to Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995


Switzerland, February 20, 2009

The last Lockerbie-Hearing at the Hight Court in Edinburgh, February 18-20, 2009, is a cheap ping-pong play from Megrahi's defence team with negligible secondary matters. (Waste of time!)

The defence-team requires permission to inspect allegedly unpublished documents that serve as proof for payments US$ 3 million, the Gauci-brothers ("Mary House" boutique) in Malta, - in order to influence their testimonies before the High Court. The attorney Mrs Scott requests that the Crown delivers all documents relating to Mr Gauci that indicate an interest in such payments for his testimony.

Prosecutors have denied deliberately withholding documents which could discredit witness Tony Gauci, who gave (douptful) evidence at the Lockerbie bomber trial. The Crown has the opinion that an investigation into disputed documents is unnecessary. The Advocate General are claiming that in some cases the documents does not exist.

MEBO facts: The alleged strange cloths found in Lockerbie (for example, the blue baby-overall) from Gauci's Boutique "Mary House" in Malta is the same manipulation as the remaining manipulated proofs like the MST-13 timer fragment and the invented infiltration of a bomb-bag on AirMalta, flight KM-180, by Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi!.
NB: The blue baby-overall was not even tested for explosive residues, and Gauci could not show the police a delivery note or a invoice for the baby-overall!


Determining central proofs:
On the feeder flight PA-103/B from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow
not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase, from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/B - was loaded, but provable 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, ex tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418; and demonstrable: MST-13 timer delivered from MEBO Ltd to Libya two years before the Lockerbie-tragedy was not involved in the PanAm 103 attack!

It's high time that Scotland's High Court decides to reestablish Libya's and Mr Megrahis damaged prestige and honour.
Otherwise the delaying tactic of the Scottish jurisdication with the help of a mysterious document "under national security" is obvious.

Leader of Libya and Chairman of the African Union (AU) Muammar al-Gadhafi seeks to change image on world stage.
For this vision Libya and all other "victims" wait for years for a clear result in a revised judgement of the Scottish Appeal Justice, in the case of Lockerbie. Helping him, in the change of the untrue background image, of the 'Lockerbie-Tragedy'. Libya and his Official have nothing to do with the PanAm 103 attack.

MEBO proposal:
For humanitarian and medical reasons the judges at the High Court in Edinburgh allow Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi to leave Scotland for medical treatment in Switzerland. Mr Megrahis family will also get permission to stay with him in Switzerland.

The Swiss governement is already in contact with Scotland via legal international assistance in this case and would guarantee the Scottish authorities to hand over Mr Megrahi for his second appeal, if his state of health permits it.

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland


Switzerland, December 24, 2008

After that 20th anniversary of the Lockerbie tragedy

How will the world be responsive to the largest miscarriage of justice in Scotland in the "Lockerbie Case", if the manipulated proofs discovered by MEBO must be confirmed at the end of Megrahis current appeal?

In 2005 Edwin Bollier presented to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) his own investigation thesis with determining facts, which among other things show clearly that no bomb suit-case was transported from air Malta via Frankfurt to London Heathrow and no MST-13 timer made for Libya was involved!
At the 28th of June 2007 the SCCRC granted Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi a second appeal because of a possible miscarriage of justice.

Assistance call for the the Arab League and all technically and scientifically trained attorneys in favour of Muslim victim of Justice, Mr. Abdelbasset Al Megrahi:

This is a cry for help and an appeal to all lawyers to engage in helping to uncover the largest miscarriage of justice in the Scottish history.

The political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271", Mr Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, is suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now >
332,075,805 painful seconds innocent in Scottish prisons …

Petition for Mr. Al Megrahi to the Scottish Ministers: here

The SCCRC is in possession of all the indication material listed at the bottom of this document. What is preventing the Scottish Justice since 9 years to clear up the miscarriage of Justice against Libya and Mr. Abdelbasset Al Megrahi?

Because of a careless investigation and manipulated evidence Mr Megrahi was sentenced to 27 years in prison on January 31, 2001 by a panel of three Scottish judges for murder of 270 people.

Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland, expose today the true facts:

The Crown's jugdgement was based on manipulated circumstantial evidence saying that Mr. Megrahi had smuggled in a "Bomb-Bag" on Air Malta, flight KM-180. This was a deliberate wrong assumption by the Scottish Justice with the known fatal consequences for the Libyan Official Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed Al Megrahi and Libya ...

The alleged "BOMB-BAG" on AirMalta was a PHANTOM!

See below MEBO's proofs, free of doubts, for specialists:

Fatal consequences for Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi because of a Phantom Bomb-Bag from Malta!

Trial Day 38, July 21, 2000, Kamp van Zeist:
Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner was a traffic assistant at the baggage handling central station FAG in Frankfurt. As witness no. 799 at the trial in Kamp van Zeist he gave a wrong testimony about the 25 transfer baggages on flight PA-103/A. The question from Q was, how many items
inter-line baggage are recorded?--

Kasteleiner, sworn (original): A- Yes. That's 25 different pieces of
inter-line baggages. Q: And were some of those items coded in at hall middle? A: Yes.- Q: And were others coded in V3?- A Yes.

MEBO, correct is: 13 pieces of
inter-line baggage and 12 pieces of on-line baggage (wrongly coded as inter-line) were transferred over the conveyance system in Frankfurt.

Important: The alleged "Bomb bag" B-8849 was not from AirMalta, it was a normal
on-line bag from Berlin, wrongly coded as inter-line bag:

Tray B-8849 came from Berlin with flight PA-643 and belonged to passenger no. 131, Misses W. Wagenführ; coded in Frankfurt via counter V3-206, code S-0009+Z1307); (Prod. 1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company,
after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/ B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125;

Important, as example:
A luggage item from AirMalta would have been transferred
inter-line on PA-103/A! PanAm PA-643 to PanAm PA-103/A is a on-line transfer.
Because of the wrong statement from Gunther Kasteleiner (all 25 bags transfered as
inter-line) the court accepted erroneously that the suitcase (Tray B-8849) came from AirMalta, KM-180...

Thus witness Gunther Kasteleiner, traffic assistant FAG, is responsible for this fatal error,
inter-line, instead of correctly on-line. Because of this error the bag B-8849 was assigned to AirMalta flight KM-180 !!!

Jointly responsible for this fatal error is a second Crown witness (no. 835), Klaus Wunderlich (FAG), who supported the wrong statement of the accusation:

"PanAm operated regular shuttle flights from Berlin to Frankfurt. Rather than send the baggage from these flights through the baggage conveyance system, if was standard practice to transport the baggage from the Berlin flight for PA-103/A directly in a trolley across the tarmac. If the loading of PA-103/A had not yet started, the trolley would be left in the baggage
hall at the gate until the aircraft was ready for loading."

"The baggage did not go through the baggage conveyance system, the bags which were transferred to PA-103/A in this way are not included on the KIK computer print out."(See: Crown prod. 1060).
However according to the passenger transfer messages (PTM) from the Berlin shuttles on December 21, 1988" (Crown Prod. 1089) as stated by Klaus Wunderlich:
  1. >*One piece of baggage was transferred from PA-643 (which arrived at *13:05) onto PA-103/A.
    (MEBO: This time was wrong, correct is:
    *13:02 on-bloc!)

  2. > Twenty one pieces of baggage were transferred from PA-647 (which arrived at 15:05) onto PA-103/A.

  3. > Four pieces of baggage were transferred from PA-649 (which arrived at 16:05) onto PA-103/A.

Important note from MEBO:
Passenger 131, Mrs W. Wagenführ was not summoned as a witness in Kamp van Zeist. She confirmed to MEBO in an interview that her flight PA-643 was already parked on gate 41, on December 21, 1988, around
*12:30.

FACT: Prod. 1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company, conveyed after off-bloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125. The flying time Berlin Frankfurt was approx 50 minutes, arrival FRA on-bloc 12:30 hour probably. The alleged arrival of PA-643, on-bloc 13:02 hour is wrong. The document, Gepäck-Anlieferung FA 32 (No. 0000158) was manipulated!
+++ .

Flight PA-124 came from Vienna und was parked in Frankfurt, at position 44, at 15:49, on-bloc. The flight number of this plane was altered at 16:15 to the new flight number: PA-103/A.

MEBO criticism:

Why the explanation of witness no. 835, Klaus Wunderlich, concerning the "standard practice", was not applicable in this case (PA-103/A):

Wunderlich's testimony: "If the loading of PA-103 had not yet commenced, the trolly would be left in the baggage hall at the gate until the aircraft was ready for loading. Because the baggage did not go through the baggage conveyancing system, the bags which were transfered to PA-103/A."

MEBO explanatory statement:

  • > Because the airplane of flight PA-103/A was only at 15:49 on-bloc on position 44, the on-line Bag from passenger Mrs. W. Wagenführ (Tray B-8849) was not loaded directly from flight PA-643 onto PA-103/A.

  • > Her baggage was also not stored in storage-room 44 because the Storeroom for Gate 44 (BO 44) was already occupied from 12:45 until 15:09 by the baggage of flight OA-1711.
    The (1) piece
    on-line baggage from passanger No. 131, W. Wagenführ from Berlin (flight PA-643) was checked on PA-103/A ordinarily via the Conveyance System and according to the rules.

  • > Feeder flight PA-643 was at 13:02 on-bloc on position Gate No. 41. Because according to the rules on-line baggage is the first Transit-baggage to be unloaded, enough time was available (5 minutes) to bring the on-line baggage of passanger 131, W. Wagenführ, from Gate 41 to the Interline counter 206,V-3.

    With tray B-8849 the
    on-line Bag, (wrongly coded as inter-line: S-0009+Z1307) was placed at 13:07 Uhr in the FRA home-storage HS33; from there it was moved at 15:17 without X-ray-Control to storage-room BO 44. (See: HS33+Z1517--BO44+Z1523). From there it was loaded on PA-103/A.
    (Notabene: For
    on-line baggage X-ray checks were only done at the first Check-In, in this case at Berlin-Tegel.

  • > AT 16:53, flight PA-103/A was off-block with destination LHR-JFK-DTW. Passanger no. 131, W. Wagenführ + 1 bag, Tray B-8849 were checked out at London-Heathrow (LHR).
    Therfore it is guaranteed that bag B-8849 was not transferred on the mainflight PA-103 to New York!

  • Supplement: The surveyed Facts

    Important confirmation, from ex witness No. 817, July 25, 2000,
    Roland O' Neil, sworn, at the court, Kamp van Zeist. Excerpt, examination by Mr. Turnbull: Q- Are you Roland O'Neil? A-Yes.----Q- And were you in fact the loadmaster for the Pan Am 103 Frankfurt-to- London flight? A-Yes, I was. ---

    Re-examination: Q- Mr. O'Neil, if bags brought to Frankfurt onboard one Pan Am flight were due to be transferred to another, (on-line is meant, MEBO) somtimes they would be transferred across the tarmac? A-Yes. Q- That would mean that they never entered the FAG baggage control system?


    A- No. As has been said, if the flight were there earlier, three-quaters of an hour earlier, then it would be entered into the system
    (like the premature arrival of PA-643, 13:02 hours, from Berlin-Tegel, MEBO)

    But if the flight arrived later, then the baggage
    was taken directly to the other plane. Q- Well, that's what I wanted to be clear about, because I think there may have been a bit of confusion about that earlier. If there was time to use the FAG system, were Pan Am bags inserted into it? A- Yes. Lord Sutherland: Thank you, Mr. O'Neil. That's all.+++

Chronology of flight OA 1711:

Flight OA 1711 was in Frankfurt on-bloc on position Gate 44 at 12:45. That's why the storage-room BO 44 was occupied until 15:09. At 15:25 the airplane from flight OA 1711 had to be moved to position 49 to deblock the storage-room BO 44 and Gate 44 for the aircraft from flight (PA-124)=PA-103/A.

Other investigation results that prove that no bomb-bag (Tray B-8849) was loaded from AirMalta KM-180 onto PanAm 103/A:

  • > From total 136 pieces of baggage (also approved by the BKA and FAA) which were loaded onto PA-103/A to Heathrow, only the 25 Transfer-baggages which came over the FRA conveyance system must be examined closely, because the remnant 111 pieces of baggage can definitely be assigned to passengers or air-companies and are excluded from being transfered by AirMalta.

  • > From these 25 baggage loaded on PA-103/A via the conveyance System only 3 pieces of baggage must be examined closely. The remnant 22 pieces of baggage can be attributed with no doubt:

  • > 1 Bag, Tray No. B-5070, coded on Interline-Counter HM-3 in FRA, Halle Mitte (Middle Hall), HM. Code: S0074+Z1320-- BP-- HS23+Z1529.
    This unaccompanied
    inter-line bag was forwarded with a PTM "Forward Message" from Alitalia flight AZ 422 and was a "lost and found-suitcase" from Susan Costa, officially examined by the BKA/FAA.

  • > 1 Bag, Tray No. B-8042, coded at Interline-Counter HM-5 in FRA, Halle Mitte, HM. Code: S-0070+Z1317--BP--HS13+Z1513.
    This accompanied
    inter-line bag belonged to Transit-passenger no. 3, *Aubrey H. (The symbol (*) indicates to an Inter-line-Passenger)

    This
    inter-line bag, Tray No. 8042, was assigned wrongly by the BKA and FAA (eventually on purpose) to on-line passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ, from feeder flight PA-643 arriving from Berlin!

  • > By this deliberate and unperceived manipulation the inter-line bag from *Transit Passagier No.3, *Aubrey H. was missing in the conveyance system. As a consequence the interline-Counter 206, V-3 could be used at 13:07 for the alleged transfer of an alleged "Bomb-Bag" (Tray B-8849) from the storagehouse HS33 to PA-103/A!
    But this
    on-line bag was doubtlessly transferred from flight PA-643 (not from AirMalta) and must be assigned to passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ from Berlin-Tegel.

  • > 24 pieces of 25 pieces of baggage can be excluded with absolut certainty. (13 inter-line bags and 11 on-line bags which were transferred over the inter-line conveyance system. Therefore the remnant bag, Tray B-8849, must be the on-line bag from passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ.

    At the interline-Counter no. 206, hall V3 this
    on-line bag was coded wrongly at 13:07 as inter-line bag (S-0009+Z1307) and was transferred to the storagehouse (HS33+Z1517) from where it was transported to the storage-room at Gate BO 44 from 15:17 on, without X-ray Control, because he was acceptet as on-line.

  • > The on-line bag (Tray B-8849) was assigned wrongly to AirMalta, flight KM-180 by a fatal accident:
    - Tray B-8849 was simultaneously coded with AirMalta baggage between 13:04 und 13:10, (13.07 at counter 206, V3);
    - the wrong testimony of sworn witness, no. 35, Klaus Wunderlich at Kamp van Zeist;
    - the wrong testimony of sworn witness no. 799, Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner at Kamp van Zeist.

Notabene: The judges at the trial in Kamp van Zeist had been deprived by Kasteleiner and Wunderlich of the information that the computer controlled conveyance system in Frankfurt could code simultaneously pieces of baggage from different airlines - on-line and inter-line (mixed) which were then brought to the store-rooms BO at the Gates of the schedulded flights or to the housestorage (HS) until they were called forward and loaded.

Therefore the assumption that bag B-8849 was transferred from AirMalta, - only because of B-8849 being coded simultaneously and together with the baggage from AirMalta KM-180, - is untenable and a careless assumption that can not be considered as an indication proof!

All this with fatal consequences for Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Libya...

RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase, from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but
3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, ex tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.



Supported et al. by investigation material from the BKA and the FAA:

  • > Passenger/Baggage list from FAA on PanAm flight F1042= (PA-103/A), 21. Dec. 1988;
  • > Official Passenger/Baggage list from flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt: C140V, 21.12.1988;
  • > Baggage/Loading list from flight PA-103/A KIK.SORT. TADD.881221, 21.12. 1988, Police Ref. DW 135;
  • > Documents: baggage-delivery F-A32, Police Ref. DW 128;
  • > BKA document No. 1790 on baggage-transport-system;
  • > BKA report ST 33 - 068507/88, HR:2327, investigationin context with the crash of PAN AM 103, Meckenheim, 02.07.1990;
  • > BKA, Police Ref. DW7b, Protocol of traffic control FA 11, Asissistant Gunther Kasteleiner on the handling of baggage at Frankfurt;
  • > BKA documents on baggage rebooking, Police Ref. DW 137;
  • > BKA documents on Transit interline Baggage X-ray B 46, shift from 9:00 to 17.00, 21.12.1988, Police Ref. DW 26;
  • > BKA documents, summary of worksheets (Arbeitszettel) from FA 32 baggage-service, Airport Frankfurt, Police Ref. DW 136;
  • > Mebo Interview with PA-643 Passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ, Berlin;
  • > Correspondence with the BKA, administrator for the PA-103 investigation, Commissioner Böhlefeld, Meckenheim.
  • > The book "SCOTBOM: Evidence and the Lockerbie Investigation", written by the former special agent of the task Force FBI/CIA for the (PanAm 103) investigation, Richard. A. Marquise, is not based on technical expertise, but a detective story, spicked with purposeful lies and full of untruth! Its purposeful intentions are clear: With wrong and manipulated evidence the truth in the PanAm 103 crash was covered at the damage of Libya and its official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi.

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland


Switzerland, December 11, 2008

Open letter to:

First Minister Alex Salmond,
Lord Davidson, Advocate General for Scotland,
Advocate Elish Angiolini QC,
and to other personalities


20th anniversary of the PanAm 103 Tragedy over Lockerbie

With faith in his innocence and hope for the soon release of the political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271, Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, painful suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now, innocent in scottish prisons.
The truth is the silence of the desert ...

With respect to the families of the PanAm 103 victims
*******************************************


The turn in the 'Lockerbie-Affair' is pre-programmed

At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 at the Appeal Court in Edinburgh suddenly confirms after more than 3 months the existence of a document „under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.

On the 20th of February 2008 the Federal Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminsters representative in Scottish matters – announced that the secret document "under national security" of an unnamed state was delivered to the British justice already in 1996. The content of the secred document is about the MST-13 timer fragment which allegedly detonated the bomb.
Prosecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy said the document had not come from the United States or its agencies like the CIA, although he did not disclose the country involved.
This important document the British justice was in possession of since 1996 was kept away from the judges at Camp Zeist, the judges at the first appeal and Megrahi's defence team.


The turn in the 'Lockerbie-Affair' began on 19th of Oktober 2007

Flashback:

On 4 July 1996 Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd handed over to the person, responsible for the investigation of the PanAm 103 crash, Commissioner Böhlefeld, Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations (BKA), in Meckenheim Germany, PanAm documents by MEBO, which proved that the luggage item Tray No. B-8849 was not transferred by AirMalta flight KM-180 on PA-103/A. The luggage item belonged to passenger No.131, W. Wagenführ, and came from Berlin with the feeder flight PA-643.

The document, FA32 luggage delivery no. 0000158, policy reference DW 128, was a falsification!

Earlier Mebo Ltd. had also presented to the Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations (BKA) an expert's assessment over the true background of the fragment of the MST-13 timer, which activated allegedly the bomb, which brought Boeing 747 down.

On the 13th of September 1996, the Crown Office received a Document, under national security, of a state secretly held (probably Germany) about the MST-13 Timer and of decisive errors in the BKA report, ST33-068507/88, about the wrong bag-transfer in Frankfurt and the origin of the alleged "Malta-Bomb" Bag, Tray B 8849.

The Lord Justice General’s decision to keep the secret document (received the 13th of September 1996) under closure indicates again very clearly, that the whole process against Megrahi and Libya was from the very beginning a political process and not a fair criminal trial!

SECRET documents which could prove the innocence of the man Abdelbaset al Megrahi, convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, are not accessible until today. The UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!!!

Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland can prove today with german investigation documents from the BKA: on the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow, not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase (B 8849) from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, items B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.

The alleged "Bomb bag" was a normal
online bag, Tray no: B-8849, from Berlin flight PA-643, passenger no. 131, W. Wagenführ; coded in Frankfurt via counter V3-206, code S-0009+Z1307); (Prod.1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company, after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/ B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125;

This bag Tray no. B-8849 from passenger 131, W. Wagenführ, was checked out at Heathrow.
That gives the warranty that this bag was not loaded on the main flight PA 103 to New York!

The prosecution should also order an inquiry concerning the bag B-8849 and the MST-13 timer-fragment via international legal assistance from Switzerland inerrogate Edwin Bollier (MEBO) and Eng. Ulrich Lumpert.

If the defense team Kelly should ignore the information, then we must ask the question, whether it actually acts on behalf of its mandator!?

It is negligent that since the year 2000 until today about 30 attorneys of Mr. Megrahi' s defence team have not considered these determining facts!!!


No bomb-bag from AirMalta KM 180

The alleged bombbag (B-8849) came not from Malta but from Berlin with passenger no. 131, W. Wagenführ, as on-line bag from feederflight PA-643, (Prod. 1089, Police Referenz DW 125; PanAm Telex after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin:
ZCZC FSA 0207, PTM: PA0643/21> PA103/21--LHRO/0/1 B1).
This bag (Tray B-8849) although an
on-line piece of baggage was wrong coded as inter-line bag on counter V3-206 but not x-rayed, because it was actually an online baggage that had been already X-ray checked in Berlin.

This
on-line bag (B-8849) wrong coded as inter-line bag got the code S0009+Z13:07. This happened at the same time (13:07 hour) when the inter-line baggage from AirMalta, KM-180, (code S0009+Z13:04-13:10) was coded at the same counter V3-206.
Therefore the wrong acceptance at the court in Kamp van Zeist 2000/2001, that the alleged bombbag (B-8849) was transfered by AirMalta, KM-180 onto PanAm, PA-103/A!!

Day 38, July 21, 2000, trail Kamp van Zeist:
Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner was traffic assistant at the baggage handling central station FAG in Frankfurt. As ex witness no. 799 at the trial in Kamp van Zeist, he gave a wrong testimony about the 25 transfer baggages on flight PA-103/A. The question from Q was, how many items
inter-line baggage are recorded?--
Kasteleiner, sworn (original): A- Yes. That's 25 different pieces of inter-line baggages. Q- And were some of those items coded in at hall middle? A Yes.- Q And were others coded in V3?- A Yes.
Correct is: 13 pieces of
inter-line baggages and 12 pieces of on-line baggages (wrong coded as inter-line) via the conveyancing system.
Important: The bag, Tray B-8849 from Berlin (flight PA-643) was an on-line bag, wrongly coded as inter-line bag.
Important: for example: A luggage item from air Malta would have been inter-line.
Through the wrong statement, Gunther Kasteleiner, the court had accepted, the bag came from AirMalta, KM-180!

Thus witness Gunther Kasteleiner (sworn) traffic assistant FAG, is responsible for this fatal error,
inter-line, instead of correctly on-line, solely the bag B-8849 could be assigned to AirMalta flight KM-180 !!!

It has been confirmed that the alleged bombbag no. B-8849 which had been coded over the counter V3-206 at 13.07 hour with code S-0009+Z1307, was forwarded on the moving floor (track in the main area HS33+Z1514) and singled out at 15.23 hour (code HS33+Z1514) to F1042/PA-103/A:

Tray: B 8849 F1042 S0009+Z1307--TO--HS33+Z1517--BO44+Z1523 V3

There was no inter-line bomb suitcase (B-8849) coming from Air Malta flight KM-180!
B-8849 was arriving
on-line from Berlin /PA-643, W. Wagenführ and was not loaded from Airplane PA-643, direct to Airplane PA-103/A, but via the inter-line counter V3-206.


Further wrong assumption by the BKA

Of totally 136 luggage items loaded on flight, PA-103/A, inclusive of 25 pieces:
13 inter-line bag's (X-rayed) and 12 on-line baggage from Berlin (not X-rayed) and wrongly accepted as inter-line baggage were transfered onto shuttles flight PA-103/A, over the baggage conveyance system at airport Frankfurt.

Important part of the passenger/luggage list, C-140V.
It shows that according to the passenger/baggage list only 3 passengers with each 3 bags were transported on PA-103/A, but additional 3 unaccompanied and unknown
inter-line bags from Lufthansa, flight LH-631, from Kuwait; dubious??

MEBO EXAMINATION. Important:

From the 124 passengers at Frankfurt who checked in for flight PA-103/A,
only 3 passenger had each 3 luggage items, according to the passenger list C140V.
  • > Passenger no. 143, T. Walker, actually traveled with his 3 luggage items (3M) with the same flight LH-631 from Kuwait to Frankfurt. Around 15:57 hour, at the transit checking counter in Frankfurt airport, Mr. Walker checked in with his 3 luggage items as tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366;

  • > Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan had 3 luggage items (3 M): tray No. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467. These luggage items were forwarded over the inter-line counter No. 203;

  • > Passenger no. 152, J. Waido checked in 3 luggage items (3 M) at the Head Checking Counter in Frankfurt: Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511.

An expert of the conveyance system in Frankfurt confirmed also MEBO's investigations that 3 pieces of unknown, unaccompanied inter-line baggage with tray numbers B-4809, B-6001, B-7418, had ben loaded at Frankfurt from flight LH-631 (Kuwait) to PanAm 103/A:

Tray:B 4809 F1042 S0074+Z1444--BP--HS33+Z1514--BO44+Z1521 HM
Tray:B 6001 F1042 S0074+Z1445--BP--HS33+Z1515--BO44+Z1522 HM
Tray:B 7418 F1042 S0074+Z1446--BP--HS13+Z1514--BO44+Z1521 HM

Thus it is absolutely clear that three additional inter-line luggage items (B-4809, B-6001, B-7418 coded over the inter-line counter HM-3) from flight LH-631 arriving from Kuwait and then transfered to flight PA-103/A don't belong to passenger no. 143, T. Walker as the BKA supposed falsely! An irresponsible mistake due to the BKA's sloppy investigations.

It is not clear up today whether these three mysterious baggage items were loaded in London-Heathrow on the mainflight, PA-103 to NewYork (JFK). Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl (ex Crown Witness no. 566) from the German Federal Criminal Investigations Bureau (BKA) testified at Camp van Zeist: "in Heathrow documents were destroyed"…

Summary of the original testimony of Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl from BKA (ex Crown Witness 566):
Other organisations who were investigating the bombing in London Heathrow had taken some of the documentation before the BKA could get its hands on it. Fuhl also testified that PanAm had apparently instructed staff at Heathrow to destroy documentation. (Ref. Doc.1 Chapter 13,
page 38)

RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase (B-8849) from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, items B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.

If the ex Denfence team of Mr. Megrahi, Duff & Taylor, at the trial in Kamp van Zeist and at the first Appeal had clinged to Edwin Bollier' s advice (Bollier's PanAm103 Disertation), the statement that a bomb suit-case with a MST-13 timer from air Malta KM-180 was transferred in Frankfurt on PA-103/A would have been dismissed in favour of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi' who would be a free man like Mr Fhimah since February 2001 … 
Duff & Taylor weren't ready to share with MEBO $ 200 millions, Libya had offered in 2000 in case Libya's innocence would be confirmed at the trial. For these reasons Duff & Taylor put their attention on the PFLP-GC-story what ended in a total disaster and in a blatant miscarriage of justice.

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerlnd

All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.


MEBO announces its investigation proofs:

Luggage items loaded and transport on flight PA-103/A, from Frankfurt to Heathrow:
Total 136 pieces (guarantee on BKA Rapport ST 33-068507/88 of 2.July 1990) consisting of:

  • 119 piece accompanied luggage items of passenger, according to passenger/baggage list C140V: (Zeist prod.199);.

  • 17 pieces unaccompanied luggage items, according to load list PA-103/A, KIK computer printout, TADD 881221, police ref. DW 135). (via the baggage conveyancing system FRA);
    (
    11 pieces on-line wrong coded as interline), 6 pieces inter-line; >

    Tray no:
    B-0622, B-1898, B-4941, B-8238, B-12244, B-11435, B-10852, B-6696, B-6559, B-6391, B-2377, from Berlin flights PA-637/PA-639/PA-107107; (Counter HM-4)

    Tray no:
    B-3148, B-4573 from LH-241 (ex Adolph Weinacker); Counter HM-2;
    Tray no;
    B-5070, from flight AZ-421, (ex Susan Costa); Counter HM-3;
    Tray no:
    B-7418, B-6001, B-4809, from Kuwait, with Lufthansa flight LH-631, all 3 bag items unaccompanied and the owner is unknown ! Counter HM-3;

___________________________________________________________________________

Details

  • 8 luggage items of passenger: 7 pieces inter-line + (1 piece on-line, wrong coded as interline) accompanied (via the conveyancing system FRA): >

    Tray no:
    B-3546, B-10773, B-10467, from flight LH-1453, passenger no.99, K. Noonan; Counter V3-203, code S-0012+time
    Tray no:
    B-5203, B-5936, from flight LH-1453, pasenger no.30, Patric M.Coyle; Counter V3-204; code S-0011+time
    Tray no:
    B-5820, from passenger no.10, L. Bennett, Counter HM-3; code S-0074+time;
    Tray no:
    B-8042, from passenger no.3, H. Aubrey, Counter HM-5, code S-0070;
    Tray no:
    B-8849, from Berlin flight PA-643, passenger no.131, W. Wagenführ; Counter V3-206;code S-0009+time;

  • 86 bags items of passenger registered on the KIK computer printout TADD 881221, have a code between: S-0500 to S-0600 + time (via checking counter airport Frankfurt, FRA).

  • 25 bags items of passenger direct transfer, airplane to airplane, not via conveyancing system at Frankfurt, bags have no Tray numbers, PTM- telex from Berlin flight, PA-647 (21 bags); PTM- telex from Berlin flight, PA-649 (4 bags), (Prod. no,1089, Police Reference DW 25)

  • 111 bags on the load list KIK TADD 881221 for flight PA-103/A consists of 86 bags , with code numbers between S-0500 to S-0600+ time, and 25 bags 13 piece inter-line, 12 piece on-line (wrong coded as interline) via the conveyancing system.

  • 119 bags on the Pasenger/Baggage list V140V, consists of 86 bags of passenger with code numbers between S-0500 to S-0600+ time, and 25 bags of passenger from Berlin flights PA-647(21 bags) and PA-649 (4 bags) direct loading onto PA-103/A, without code or Tray number, registered only on PTM telex, (prod.1089) + 7 pieces of inter-line + (1 piece of on-line, wrong coded as interline) accompanied (via the conveyancing system FRA): >

  • 136 bags Total: consists of baggage on load list KIK TADD 881221 for PA-103/A, 111 bags + 25 bags from Berlin flights PA-647 (21 bags) and PA-649 (4 Bags), without Tray and code number, only 3 PTM telexe, prod 1089, Police Reference DW 125;


by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland



All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.


November, 28th, 2008

The scottish provocation:

We are neither pessimistic nor optimistic about Megrahi's appeal, but we are determined to reveal the Scottish miscarriage of justice with our exonerating evidence and thus help to rehabilitate Libya and give Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi his honour back.

We will prove that Libya and Mr Al Megrahi had absolutely nothing to do with the PanAm 103 bombing!

A revised judgement in favour of Libya and its official Mr. Megrahi will rise Libya's international reputation and the prestige of Libya's leader Muammar Gaddafi and his son Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, who was a key figure in normalizing Libya's relations with the World and make the international community aware of the unjust UN-embargo against Libya and its people.



It is so simple to prove: No Bag transfer from air Malta, KM-180 onto PanAm PA-103/A
  • 3 Bags, Tray no. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467; Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan.via (V3-203). inter-line.
  • 3 Bags, Tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418; unaccompanied from flight LH-631 from Kuwait, via (HM-3) inter-line.
  • 1 Bag, Tray no. B-8042; Passenger, H.Aubrey, via (HM-5). inter-line.
  • 1 Bag, Tray no. B-5620; Passenger, L. Bennett, via (HM-3) inter-line.
  • 1 Bag, Tray no. B-5620; unaccompanied, from Roma, flight AZ-422, ex. S. Costa, via (HM-3) inter-line.
  • 2 Bags, Tray no. B-3148, B-4573; unaccompanied, from flight LH-241, ex pass. A. Weinacker, via (HM-2) inter-line.
  • 2 Bags, Tray no. B-5203, B5936; from flight, LH-1453, passenger P.M. Coyle, via (V3-204) inter-line.
  • 1 Bag, Tray no. B-8849; from Berlin, flight PA-643, passeng. no.131, W.Wagenführ, via (HM-206) on-line, wrongly accepted as inter-line!! (without X-ray)
  • 11 Bags, Tray no. B-0622, B-1898, B-4971, B-8238, B-12244, B-11435, B-10852, B-6696, B-6559, B-6391, B-2377; from Berlin, flight PA-637/639/107 on-line, wrongly accepted as inter-line!! (without X-ray)
  • --------
  • 25 Bags total

All luggage items, total 25 pieces of baggage, 13 inter-line bag's (X-rayed) and 12 on-line baggage from Berlin (not X-rayed) and wrongly accepted as inter-line baggage were transfered onto shuttles flight PA-103/A, over the baggage conveyance system at airport Frankfurt.

No luggage item came from AirMalta flight KM-180!!

Unfortunately, the on-line Bag from Berlin flight PA-643, Tray no. B-8849 was given the the code S0009+Z13:07 at the same time (13:07) together with the inter-line baggage from AirMalta, KM-180, (code S0009+Z13:04-13:10) by the same Counter V3-206. Therefore the wrong acceptance at the court in Kamp van Zeist 2000/2001, that the bag was transfered by AirMalta, KM-180 onto PanAm, PA-103/A!!

The remaining 86 pieces of baggage from 111 pieces listed on the load list, KIK.Sort.TADD, 881221, PA-103/A, production 1060, (Zeist), police reference: DW135, can be assigned without problems to the respective passengers or airlines.

°°°

Important part of the passenger/luggage list, C-140V.

It shows that according to the passenger/baggage list not only 3 passengers with each 3 bags were transported on PA-103/A, but additional 3 unaccompanied
inter-line bags from Lufthansa, flight LH-631, from Kuwait; dubious??

  • 3 Bags, Tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366; Passenger no. 143, T. Walker, via (Transit-Check.count. FRA) in-line.
  • 3 Bags, Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511; Passenger no. 152, J. Waido, via (Check. count. FRA). in-line
  • 3 Bags, Tray no. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467; Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan, via (V3-203). inter-line.
  • 3 Bags, Tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418; unaccompanied from flight LH-631 from Kuwait, via (HM-3) inter-line.

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland


27th November, 2008

Today and tomorrow the ninth Appeal hearing is taking place at the High Court in Edinburgh. Very hopefully the long overdue truth isn't further delayed intentionally for the Damage of Libya and at the Cost of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi's Life!

A doubtful anniversary

Seventeen years ago, on November 14, 1991 the US of Justice and the Crown Office in Scotland accused two Libyan Officials for murder of the 270 victims of the PanAm 103 disaster!

On January 31, 2001, Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi was convicted of murder by a panel of three Scottish judges and sentenced to 27 years in prison.
The second accused Mr. Lamin Khalifah Fhimah was acquitted.

Megrahi's appeal against his conviction was refused on March 14, 2002. On September 23, 2003 Megrahi applied to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) for his conviction to be reviewed, and on 28 June 2007 the SCCRC announced its decision to refer the case to the High Court in Edinburgh after it found he may have suffered a miscarriage of justice.

Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi's unfortunate destiny was to become Lockerbie victim no. 271 as a political hostage, because the PanAm 103 assassination attempt was used for a conspiracy against Libya.

Coincidentally and shortly before the 20th anniversary of the tragedy it has been
confirmed that only 3 passengers had each 3 luggage items loaded on PanAm flight PA-103/A at Frankfurt airport on Dezember 21, 1988. (Corresponding with the passenger/luggage list, C-140V and FAG KIK TADD 881221 computer printout).

Thus it is proven that
3 inter-line bags, unknown and unaccompanied, were transported by Lufthansa flight LH-631 from Kuwait and were additionally loaded at Frankfurt on the feeder flight PanAm PA-103/A to London/Heathrow airport!
Until today remains unexplained to whom these 3 luggage items belonged and whether they were loaded on flight PanAm 103 from London to New York?

MEBO EXAMINATION. Important:

From the 124 passengers at Frankfurt who checked in for flight PA-103/A,
only 3 passenger had each 3 luggage items, according to the passenger list C140V.

MEBO cover-up:
  1. Passenger no.143, T. Walker, actually traveled with his 3 luggage items (3M) with the same flight LH-631 from Kuwait to Frankfurt. Around 15:57 clock at the transit checking counter in Frankfurt airport, Mr. Walker checked in with his 3 luggage items as tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366.
  2. Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan had 3 luggage items (3 M): tray No. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467. These luggage items were forwarded over the inter-line counter No. 203;
  3. Passenger no. 152, J. Waido checked in 3 luggage items (3 M) at the Head Checking Counter in Frankfurt: Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511.

Thus it is absolutely clear that the additional 3 inter-line luggage items (trays no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418 coded over the inter-line counter HM-3) from flight LH-631 arrival from Kuwait and then transfered to flight PA-103/A don't belong to passenger T. Walker as the BKA supposed falsely! An irresponsible mistake due to the BKA's sloppy investigations.

RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase, from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, ex tray no.
B-4809, B-6001, B-7418!

It is not clear up today whether this mysterious baggage items were loaded in London-Heathrow on the mainflight, PA-103 to NewYork (JFK). Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl (Crown Witness no. 566) from the German Federal Criminal Investigations Bureau (BKA) testified at Camp van Zeist: "in Heathrow documents were destroyed"…

Summary of the original testimony of Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl from BKA (Crown Witness 566):

Other organisations who were investigating the bombing had taken some of the documentation before the BKA could get their hands on it. Fuhl also testified that PanAm had apparently instructed staff at Heathrow to destroy documentation. (Ref. Doc.1 Chapter 13 page 38)

Totally 3 luggage items (2+1) planned for that far transport, were never loaded onto PanAm Main flight PA-103.

  1. unaccompanied on-line luggage item, a brown Samsonite suit-case with rush tags, of PanAm copilot John Hubbard, was never loaded onto PA-103.
  2. inter-line luggage items of Daniel O'Connor (A State department official) were never loaded onto PA-103.

All 3 bags were found after the atrack on PA-103 into the baggage room at airport Heathrow...

Questions: How could the load list of the Boing 747, PA-103 be correct, if 3 luggage items were missing?

Were the 3 luggage items in Heathrow exchanged with the mysterious 3 luggage items from flight LH-631/PA-103/A from Kuwait to Frankfurt to Heathrow, with the 3 luggage items of Daniel O'Connor (2M) and John Hubbard (1M)?

Had therefore in Heathrow the documents of the PanAm-103 to be destroyed?


New Lockerbie posts on Professor Dr. Robert Black's lockerbie case blogspot ...


The great interest for the new Lockerbie blog entitled
'The Masonic Verses' - Lockerbie and Related Scams has to be welcomed.
The blog takes the form of a critique of the evidences around the bombing of the PanAm flight PA-103 and informs on doubtful proofs.

MEBO will publish soon on its webpage:
www.lockerbie.ch and in comments and letters rebutted in a review a lot of evidence in connection with the official Police- und FAA investigations between 1990-2008 used for the wrong accusation of Megrahi and Fimah.

And a lot of this material was discovered by MEBO Ltd first.
For examples:

  • the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer;
  • no bomb suit-case from AirMalta (KM-180) transfer to PanAm (PA-103/A) in Frankfurt;
  • no blue baby overall sell through shopkeeper Tony Gautci (Mary House) in Malta;
  • the security observation visit, of Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta (ordered by his chief El Bishari) from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988, have nothing to do with the Lockerbie tragedy;
  • the important distance between the bomb and the skin of the aircraft Boeing 747, (25 inch), published in the official Air Accident Investigation Report (AAIB) etc.

Mebo pointed out before start of the process at Kamp van Zeist, on 3 May 2000, in a letter to Lord Advocate Colin Boyd, that this distance of 25 inch that the "Bomb case" was placed before the container AVE 4041 and not in the container (see pictures on www.lockerbie.ch/news/pictures.html). This was confirmed in a report by explosive expert Professor Dr. Hiltmar Schubert from the Fraunhofer Institut in Munich, Germany!

The court adjourned for 10 days and brought in a second expert to clarify this question and concluded that the distance was fortuitious ...

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland


14th November, 2008

The High Court in Edinburgh refused to day to release the political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271", Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi, and rejected his appeal to be freed on bail because he has terminal cancer. Mr Megrahi will remain in jail while his appeal continues...

Mr Megrahi, winner is the truth !

The next step for the coming appeal case (subject miscarriage of justice) is a hearing, assigned for 27th and 28th November 2008. At this hearing parties will discuss their proposals in relation to case management and a time plan for the final appeal.

The Scottish PanAm 103-Indication Process was based on falsified and manipulated evidence

The circumstantial evidence used to implicate Libya and his official Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie bombing was a FAKE! It is high time that the second delayed appeal brings light into this clear and impertinent miscarriage of justice.

The Lockerbie Prophecy

The second appeal judgement in the "Lockerbie Affair" will reveal the scandalous fraud against Libya: a clear and deliberate miscarriage of justice! (conspiracy against Libya)

That’s why the Crown is delaying and protracting their final decision ! Their only concern is how to back out of the affair and save the respectability of the Scottisch and British Legal System.

But their tactics to cover up the truth about the conspiracy against Libya will be in vain.

The Scottish politicians and Lord Advocates should already prepare which measures to take against the three Judges responsible for the misjugdement, if Megrahi's appeal will be proved a miscarriage of justice by the High Court in Edinburgh?

Nevertheless the damage is done. Moral damage for Mr Abdulbaset al-Megrahi: Up to now 9,7 painful years (from 27 years) suffering innocently as political hostage in Scottish prisons.

Extorted compensation payments to the relatives of those killed in the Lockerbie bombing in the amount of US$ 2.7 billions.
Compensation payments for the destroyed Boing 747 and the bankrupt of Pan American Airways company: approximately US$ 140 mio.
Financial damage for MEBO Ltd.: US$ 60 mio.
Financial damage by the UN-embargo for the Libyan State: approximately US$ 40 billions! Not to forget that the Libyans people suffered severely under the sanctions

Prestige damage worldwide for Great Britain and Scotland: immeasurable…

by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland


27th October, 2008

The Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (EDA/FDFA) delivered to Libya on the 25th of October 2008 officially the assurance that Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi can stay and be treated for his illness in a Swiss hospital, after his release in Scotland.
Cordial thanks to the Federal Councilor Mrs Micheline Calmy-Rey, Head of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs.
We wish Mr Abdulbaset Al Megrahi to get healthy and free soon and ask for ALLAH'S assistance, ... ALLAHU AKBAR ...

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland


18th October, 2008

Legal victory for the Libyan Political hostage, Official
Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi, "Lockerbie Victim no. 271"

Congratulation for the work of solicitor Mr Tony Kelly. It is an important victory for Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and for the forthcoming prestige of the Leader of Libya, Muammar al-Gadhafi, after winning the appeal.
The next hearing on the High Court in Edinburgh is planned to take place on the 27th and 28th of November 2008.

MEBO’s comment:
The desision of the appeal court confirms that the procedures of the SCCRC-tests for a reappeal were absolutely not in accordance with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

On the 28th of June 2007, Mr Megrahi’s lawers, rejected the SCCRC-ruling as fabrication.
Solicitor Tony Kelly said:
We don’t have to limit our appeal on the grounds the Commission has identified. We have carte blanche to make it on as many grounds as we want.
This includes the claims about the most important fragment of the bomb’s timing mechanism that was allegedly found in the countryside near Lockerbie in the months after the atrocity.

+++


The Commission deliberately suppressed among other things, the evidence concerning the
two times manipulated MST-13 Timer fragment. On top of that a high ranking Scottish official is deliberately holding back MEBO’s criminal complaint regarding the falsification of evidence since the 11th of June 2000.
The revision of the wrong judgement against the Libyan Official Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie-case must
first of all start with the rejection of the former line of argumentation concerning the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer (PT/35B) by the Scottish Justice.

Reason: the first implication of Libya with the PanAm 103 bombing was based
only on the wrong conclusion at Kamp van Zeist and its first appeal that the decisive piece of evidence - the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer - did originate from a timer delivered to Libya.

Today with
BKA documents it can be proved beyond all doubt that on the 21th of December 1988 no "bomb bag" was loaded on AirMalta, flight KM-180 at Luqa airport and therefore none "Malta-bag" was transfered in Frankfurt on PanAm 103/A to Heathrow. The "Lockerbie-Case" was a miscarriage of Scottish Justice, because the court did not consider all the available exonerate evidence.
The alleged "bomb-bag", tray no.
(B-8849) was not a inter-line bag from AirMalta (KM-180). This bag was a normal on-line bag, wrong coded as inter-line bag from Berlin-Tegel, flight PanAm, PA-643, and was checked out at London-Heathrow, from passenger no. 131, Wagenführ W.
Thus it is secured, that bag was not transfered on the main flight PA-103 to New York!

Therefore the
security observation visit, of Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta (ordered by his chief El Bishari) from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988, and his alleged infiltration of a "bomb bag" has no probative force any more!
The de-conspiracy of the conspiracy against Libya can begin…

(by ebol, Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland)



07th Oct 2008

The rehablitation Libya's and its Official
Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi is within sight

There are more and more accumulations of demonstrable evidence of proof falsifications that the Scottish Justice suppresses. How comes that the Scottish Justice does not resist the justified reproaches of Edwin Bollier (MEBO Ltd.) and ex-engineer Ulrich Lumpert (in his affidavit) in this crucial affair?
Reason: Because their allegations were developed on fundamental evidence (hardware) and the responsible persons behind the falsifications of this crucial evidence would be exposed!

It would be easy, the Scottish Justice could as before in 1990/91, let fatal reproaches be examined for the truth with international legal assistance from Switzerland.
NB: (PII) With the non-opening of the document under "National Security", the Scottish Justice wants to protect the same official people who through falsification of evidence held Libya and Mr. Megrahi responsible for the attack 0n PanAm 103 …

Legally justified points of views (software) of lawyers are important and needed, however they are questionable (controversial) and time-consuming.
The fact is that we have only the defence evidence (hardware), - the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (PT/35B) - to prove that Libya's and Megrahi's had nothing to do with the PanAm 103 assassination attempt.

The central fragment MST-13, (PT/35B) which is the only piece of evidence to connect Libya allegedly with the PanAm 103 assassination attempt, lies in the archive of the Scottish High Court and is ruled out today as proof, because it has not a in-scratched letter "M" on it. Thus it is free of doubts a falsification!

"To cash in as much as possible money from Libya", is the slogan of the Solicitors: "Money, money, money and more funds to delay the process unnecessarily. Mr. Megrahi and Libya's Solicitors Duff & Taylor, Mac Kechnie and Tony Kelly etc. until today, after 10 years, did not rehabilitate Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi and Libya.
The cause: All Solicitors involved had obviously or deliberately failed to appropriate suitable special experts, who can determine and put the defence evidence of MEBO Ltd. (hardware and software) into the center of the defense.
(Today in the focus: As can be proved, no "Bomb bag" loaded in Malta and no MST-13 fragment of a timer etc. supplied to Libya.

by Edwin Bollier


21th Sep 2008

Was the Lockerbie tragedy abused for a conspiracy
against Libya, in the name of Great Britain?

The bombing of PanAm 103 on the 21th of Dezember 1988 killing all 259 people on board and 11 inhabitants in Lockerbie was not motivated by a revenge of Libya against the United States for the U.S. airstrikes on Tripoli and Benghazi on the 14th of April 1986 killing 41 people, including leader Moammar Al Gadhafi's adopted daughter.

There was no motive for Libya to bomb PA-103. Libya and the official Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi don’t have anything to do with the Lockerbie tragedy. This is a deliberate and bad-willing assumption, a conspiracy against Libya.
The opening of the document "under national security" would bring the proof for a miscarriage of justice and the freedom for Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and Libya.

by Edwin Bollier


20th Sep 2008

In the name of the State: The truth (PII) remains
covered in a document under national Security...

To prevent international legal assistance from Switzerland and the potential disgrace for the Scottish justice system and to divert at the same time from the explosive affidavit of Lumpert, the newspaper "The Herald" communicated on the 3rd of October 2007 that behind ground 5 of the SCCRC-report a top secret classified document "under national security" was hidden and that its content is about the MST-13 timer. This after the editor of the Herald was feeded with information from the secret and unpublished 800 pages report of the commission's findings.

At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal court in Edinburgh suddenly confirmed after more than 3 months the existence of a document "under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.

Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC agreed on the 20th of February 2008 to open the secret document but the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminster's representative in Scottish matters - refused so and argued that it was not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed higher national interests: "The national security was at stake"!!!

Seemingly the content of the document "under national security" (MST-13 timer) is so high-explosive that the national security of Great Britain is at stake !!!

Prosecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy added that the secret document did not originate from the USA or one of ist agencies as the CIA.

For provable special reasons only two countries come into consideration for having passed the document 'under national security' to Great Britain: Switzerland or Germany. Reason: The manipulated "Lockerbie MST-13 timer fragment" did not come from a timer supplied to Libya in 1985/86.

Why the national security in Great Britain would be in danger with the opening of the document?

At least these two ex RARDE experts, Dr.Thomas Hayes and Allen Feraday, were involved as officials in the manipulations of the MST-13 (PT/35) fragment and the falsifications in the examination report page 51, photo PP8932, PI/995, memorandum to Insp.William Williamson, etc.

At least this two officials experts were responsible for the deliberately wrong accusation by linking the MST-13 fragment to Libya and the PanAm 103 Tragedy. In reality the crown wants to protect Hayes and Feraday. They are a real problem for the public security in Great Britain, why?

Who gave the ex RARDE experts Dr.Thomas Hayes and all Feraday the order to falsifications evidence in context with the MST-13 (PT/35) fragment? Came the order from the state?

If RARDE experts Dr.Thomas Hayes and Allen Feraday acted in the name of the state remains covered until the police will prosecute these two officials for falsification of evidence.

This is the true reason for the non-disclosure of the document "under national security" (PII) ...

by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd


10th Sep 2008

The trustworthy relief of Libya and its Official,
Abdelbaset al Megrahi, in the Lockerbie-affair

The revision of the wrong judgement against the Libyan Official Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie-case must first of all start with the rejection of the former line of argumentation concerning the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer (PT/35) by the Scottish Justice.

Reason: the first implication of Libya with the PanAm 103 bombing was based only on the wrong conclusion at Kamp van Zeist and its first appeal that the decisive piece of evidence - the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer - did originate from a timer delivered to Libya.

Based on this wrong conclusion was the attempt to involve Mr Megrahi into the crime by very questionable and wrong evidence from Malta. The affidavit of Ex-MEBO engineer Ulrich Lumpert from the 18th of July 2007 and his live declaration on ITV (August, 2008) in assistance of Dr. Jim Swire should make the appeal-court sit up and take notice ...

Today it can be proved that on the 21th of December 1988 no "bomb bag" was loaded on AirMalta, flight KM-180 at Luqa airport in Malta. Therefore the visit of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988 and his alleged infiltration of a "bomb bag" has no evidence any more!


3th Sep 2008

Which role played Ex-FBI Special Agent
Richard Marquise in the "Lockerbie-Affair"?

Ex-FBI "Special" Agent and head of the Task Force in the "Lockerbie-Case", Richard A. Marquise, exposed himself with his own justifications! He is still defending and protecting FBI forensic expert Tomas Thurman, who was meanwhile convicted in the United States for having tampered with forensic evidence. Was he possibly the crucial perpetrator behind the conspiracy against Libya in the Lockerbie-Affair?
The content in Marquise's doc.-book "Scotbom: Evidence and the Lockerbie Investigation" leads to this conclusion! Mr. Richard A. Marquise confirms that there is no evidence against Libya. The fragment of a MST-13 timer fragment originated from a first handfabricated prototype not delivered to Libya. Top of form 1, bottom of form 2 for example, he confirms that the PT-35 = (MST-13) timer fragment descends from the first handfabricated prototype serie of 1985! ('Scotbom', Chapter 11)

Original excerpt, under Chapter 11:
After Lumpert's statement, Lumpert (ex-Engeneer at MEBO Ltd) was the first witness and after examining a photograph the PT-35, (MST-13 Fragment) testified the chip had come from a circuit board for a timer he designed and built in 1985 at the request of Bollier. ----------- He had learned one week prior to the hearing that this timer might have been used in a bomb.
He believed the chip had come from one of the first timers made. He detailed how he had designed this circuit board, nothing the slight imperfections on PT-35. Once the master board was made, the imperfections showed up on the other circuit boards from that master.

Why has ex-FBI Special Agent Marquise suppressed this most important proof in favour of Libya at the court in Kamp van Zeist? I am convinced his role and function in the "Lockerbie-fraud" will be revealed at the appeal. Hello to the memory: The MST-13 timers supplied to Libya were not prototypes of the first serie!

The truth at the High Court in Edinburgh will bring it shortly to the day … We require that Mr Marquise appears at the High Court in Edinburgh as a witness.

Edwin Bollier, VR MEBO Ltd
Zurich/Switzerland



Request to the Scottish Justice

On September 1st, 2008 the month of fasting, Ramadan began for muslims. Message to the Scottish Justice in Edinburgh: After the current realizations, for instance, the statement of truth in engineer Lumpert's affidavit, please release Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi during the time of fresh judgement under electronic house detention (GPS surveillance) in his house in Glasgow, Scotland.

Thank you for your attention, Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd


21th August 2008

The High Court in Edinburgh granted the appellant's request
 
Today's procedural hearing related to the appellant's, Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi, two petitions for access to evidence-material used at the Zeist trial, or referred to in material used at the trial, including documents and photographs.
The Crown intimated that it was no longer opposing the appellant's application to be allowed to show the originals to an identification expert. The examination should take place in the presence of the Prof. Steve Clark, psychologist of the University of California, USA.
The most important aspect of today's hearing is the ease and speed with which the court dismissed the Crown's submissions and granted the appellant's requests.


Zurich, 14th Aug 2008

Libya and USA sign compensation deal today

The deal will see as well US compensation paid for the Libyan victims for U.S. airstrikes on Tripoli and Benghazi on 14 April, 1986, killed 41 people, including leader Moammar Al Gadhafi's adopted daughter.
US President Bush expressed in a letter his greeting to the Leader Moammar Al Gathafi and his satisfaction about bilateral relations between Libya and United states of America. US President praised in his letter the Leader's continuous efforts for stability of the world, especially in Africa.

(By Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier)


Zurich, 4th Aug 2008

Both the US Senate and the House of Representatives passed the bill that grants Libyan immunity law and full diplomatic and economic status. President Bush signed on August 4, 2008 into law: S.3370, the "Libyan Claims Resolution Act." The bill to settle all Libya lawsuits by USA.

Libya-USA Packet-Claims Deal

Libya and USA have reached a comprehensive agreement to settle all controversial claims tied to Libya-related unprove terrorism from the 1980s. The agreement says: Libya to make a single payment of US$ 1 billion pro saldo all claims to a US government-administered entity. That entity would oversee the compensation for victims of the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 (remainder of payment US$ 536 mio) and victims of the 1986 La Belle nightclub bombing attack in Berlin (US$ 289 mio) and to victims of UTA-772 flight, 1989.

Important clearing-up:
Libya did pay all of the compensation
under explicit objection that Libya had absolutely nothing to do with this terror acts and could therefore not be made responsible for eventually commited crimes by any of its citizens not acting on governmental instructions.
In the world media this objection is never mentioned. This tricky suppression of the whole statement by the world's leading news agencies leads to the generally accepted but nevertheless totally wrong notion: If they paid, they did it.
Libya, ask for the following US warranties; excerpt:
> In exchange for the money the US would formally immunize Libya from
any further claims, and all American oil and financial companies -- which have been reluctant to invest in Libya while the lawsuits persisted -- could do business there without fear of penalty.
> Payment for the victims of the April 1986 US raid on Libya.
> Warranty for all efforts to secure the return of Libyan Abdelbasset Al-Megrahi from Scotland direct to Tripoli/Libya, after the acquittal by the Appeal High Court at Edinburgh. The Libyan is serving a prison sentence in Scotland after being found guilty
in an completely unfair trial in Kamp van Zeist for the blowing up of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie.

Why Libya pays?:
> Regain full diplomatic and economic status. This would allow US oil companies to negotiate hundreds of billions of dollars worth of contracts, to drill the state's oilfields.
Again and again: Libya and the official Abdelbaset al Megrahi have nothing to do with the Lockerbie-Tragedy.

Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. give the Crown, Lord Advocate General and the Appeal Court, the full warranty that the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (PT-35B) does not come from a timer supplied to Libya and therefore cannot be brought in connection with Libya.

Yours faithfully
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO LTd, Switzerland



RECOMMENDATION TO THE CROWN AND TO THE
LORD ADVOCATE GENERAL IN UNITED KINGDOM

Honorable Crown and Honorable Lord Advocate General,

There is no need to open the mysterious
document under national security and it seems to be a waste of time. There is a simpler possibility: Please examine the original MST-13 timer-fragment with the scratched letter "M" and the 8 layers of fiber glass (reference evidence photo PI/995 of RARDE).
The examination should take place in the presence of the Prof. Steve Clark, of the University of California, USA, as an identification expert and under UN Observer Prof. Dr. Hans Koechler.
NB. The MST-13 timer supplied to Libya (1985-86) were equipped with PC boards with
9 layers of fiber glass.

Only the original MST-13 fragment, with
8 fiber glass layers and the marking "M" (Prototype) proves that the country of Libya and its official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi cannot be in connection with the "Lockerbie Tragedy"!

The MST-13 fragment was examined and sawed into two parts on 27th of April 1990 at the company Siemens AG, Munich Germany, by its vice Director, Johannes Brosamle. No doubt !!! Libya and his official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi were deliberately entangled with the bombing of PanAm 103 by the
manipulated piece of evidence MST-13 timer fragment (PT-35B)
Ref: Siemens AG labor photographs ZPL-TW11-14; Siemens AG report ZPL-TW12, (28. April 1990); BKA report STV87/90F.

Yours faithfully
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO LTd, Switzerland

Link to: Professor Dr. Robert Black blogspot



Intentional delay of the Scottish Justice against the
Libyan Muslim Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, a shame!

Prior to the next public procedural hearing on August 20th 2008, there is to be a private hearing on August 19th involving only the Crown and the Advocate General. More than a year has passed since the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission referred Abdelbaset Megrahi's case back to the Criminal Appeal Court on the basis that his conviction might have amounted to a miscarriage of justice...

Abdelbaset Al Megrahi has called in Prof. Steve Clark, of the University of California, USA, as an ID-expert to compare and identify for instance the original FBI photos (Timer-Fragment MST-13), with photos and the hardware that were shown to witness Edwin Bollier in court in Kamp van Zeist.

Why again a delay and why has no date yet been fixed for the hearing of the appeal?
The answer is simple: Probably racism, because Mr. Megrahi is citizen of a Muslim Country! This must end. The delay is becoming scandalous. The reputation of Scotland's criminal justice system is being further tarnished in the eyes of the world. Topic in the next meeting of the Arab league. Do not forget: Muslims have oil power, thank to ALLAH...
Link to: Professor Dr. Robert Black


Read the DEPOSITION from Susan Lindauer, signed this 4th day of December, 1998 in the presence of a notary public. Their hearing started on the 7th of July, 2008 in New York USA.
UN Observer to the Lockerbie Trial says 'totalitarian' appeal process bears
the hallmarks of an "intelligence operation":
Prof. Dr. Koechler's letter can be read here.
LOCKERBIE
The biggest fraud in the history of Scotland !

more information....

This is the key for the final proof that the MST-13 fragment
does not descend from a timer supplied to Libya.

PT-35B, joined from two parts: PT-35(
b) + DP-31(a) = PT-35B




FOR A FAIR END IN THE LOCKERBIE-AFFAIR

MEBO Proposal for a partial disclosure of the document "under national security"

In order that the content of the document "under national security" and the country involved are not publicly disclosed there is the possibility that

1 member of the SCCRC and 2 personalities either/or of the EU or the UNO

would have access to view this important document under the condition of not making the country involved and the content of the document public.
But the content of the document "under national security" could be used for the benefit of Abdelbaset al Megrahi's appeal proceedings.

In the sense of the Arab League. Edwin Bollier


Was the Lockerbie-affair the beginning of
an undeclared war against Libya?
more....
PETITION FOR RECOVERY OF DOCUMENT
read the Appeal Court verdict from 7. March, 2008
Link zur deutschen Übersetzung

The UK General Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, and the Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, QC, can only delay the victory of truth in the "Lockerbie-scandal" but not prevent it ...


Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi exluded from prison exchange

Greatbritain did not take into account that unjustly sentenced Abdelbaset Al Megrahi would oppose leaving Scotland and spending the rest of his sentence in a Libyan prison without a complete and honourful reversal of his verdict. He strongly withhold any temptations to leave Scottish prisons by a political deal (Blair's "memorandum in the desert").

Megrahi's integrity against all pressure on him will ensure that the truth in the Lockerbie-Affair is not covered up completely.

To exclude Megrahi's prison exchange to Libya, Libyan’s minister of foreign affairs, Abdal Rahman Shalagan, will probably ratify on the 12th of March 2008 in London the memorandum over "the reciprocal extadition and transfer of prisoners"– under explicit exclusion of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi.

***

Already on the 8th of June 2007 MEBO published the following message on its webpage:

No secret deal over Mr Al Megrahi's prison exchange to Libya.

The only correct way for Mr Al Megrahi to prove his innocence is via the soon expected positive decision of Megrahi’s appeal bid by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and through the verdict „not guilty“ by the Scottish High Court!

This is the correct way for Mr Al Megrahi to return honourfully to his homeland Libya. Al Megrahi has consistently maintained his innocence and vowed to stay in Scotland and win his freedom through the appeal courts.

***

Non-disclosure of the document "under national security"

As predicted the decision of the Lord Justice General on the 7 of March 2008 definitely not to open the document "under national security" to Megrahi’s defence will be used by the defence as a strong argument for the release of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi. The suppression of exonerating evidence for reasons of national security violates civil and human rights of the defendant and must be considered as a miscarriage of justice.

The Lord Justice General’s decision to keep the secret document (received the 13th of September  1996) under closure indicates again very clearly that the whole process against Megrahi and Libya was from the very beginning a political process and not a fair criminal trial!


Why the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment plays
such an important role in the "Lockerbie-scandal"?

The prosecution was already in possession of at least one MST-13 timer before the timer fragment was allegedly found in the collar of a T-shirt at the site of Lockerbie. This timer was used to set up the wrong trace to incriminate Libya and put heavy economical sanctions (embargo*) on Libya (1993). Then Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Mr al-Amin Khalifa Fhima were found as scape-goats and indicted. For Megrahi's conviction the Malta-bombing-suitcase theorie was invented (2001).

***

*embargo

After the handing over of the two Libyans to Kamp Zeist (1999) the UN-embargo on Libya (since 1993) was provisionally lifted, after Libya's forced paying compensation (2003) to the descendants of the victims (US$ 2.7 billion) the sanctions were lifted definitely. Libya did pay compensation under explicit objection that the state of Libya had absolutely nothing to do with this terror act and could therefore not be made responsible for eventually commited crimes by any of its citizens not acting on governmental instructions.

In the world media this objection is never mentioned. This tricky suppression of the whole statement by the world's leading news agencies leads to the generally accepted but nevertheless totally wrong notion: If they paid, they did it.

***

The disclosure of the document "under national security" about the MST-13 timer would reveal the conspiracy against Libya and Megrahi not only as a miscarriage of justice but as criminal machinations of western secret services and their governments.

Which facts lead do the discovery of the document
"under national security" in the Lockerbie-Affair?

Chronology:
In the run of the criminal investigations in the Lockebie-Affair the Swiss Federal Police (BUPO) in April 1990 showed FBI-Polaroid-Fotos of a fragment of an electronic board to the owners of MEBO Ltd (Erwin Meister and Edwin Bollier).
Edwin Bollier understood quickly, that the pictures showed a fragment of a MST-13 timer PC-board fabricated by MEBO.
At a close inspection Bollier noticed an important detail that the PC-board originated from a handmade Prototype and that it was fabricated from a non-functioning MST-13 timer.

After further interviews through FBI-Officials and officers of the Scottish Police in Zurich and after Bollier's visites in 1991 at the FBI in Washington and at the Scottish Police in Glasgow he understood clearly: The allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment in Lockerbie was a manipulated piece of evidence with the intention to link the state of Libya with the Lockerbie-atrocity.

In 1991 Bollier was invited to the FBI Headquarter in Wahington and Commissioner Richard Marquise offered him up to 4 million US$ and a new identity in the States if he would confirm in a police statement that the allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment originated from one of the 20 timers delivered to Libya between 1985 und 1986.

Now there was no more doubt for Bollier that a huge conspiracy against Libya was on the way.

Contrary to the Libyan crown witness against Libya, Abdul Jiacha, - an agent in the sold of the CIA – Bollier rejected the offer. Jiacha is currently living in the USA under a new identity.

Bollier is today after 18 years of work in the Lockerbie-affair convinced that the decision of the Westminster Justice to keep the document "under national security" closed has the purpose to frustrate the truthfinding about the manipulated MST-13 Timer fragment and to avoid paying compensation:

On the 28th of June 2007 the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) announced at its press conference and probably also in its 800 pages report – which was not public but later on parts of it leaked to the Herald – that a miscarriage of justice may have occured in the conviction against Megrahi and identified 6 grounds that doubted his conviction. The summary of the report (only 14 pages) released to the press named only 4 of the grounds. On the third of October 2007 "The Herald" published all 6 grounds: Ground 5 concerns the secret document "under national security" about the MST-13 timer; ground 6 the alleged remuneration of up to US$2 million to
witness Tony Gauci (owner Mary House in Malta) by an US Intelligence Agency.

At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal Court in Edinburgh suddenly confirms after more than 3 months the existence of a document „under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.

On the 20th of February 2008 the Federal Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminsters representative in Scottish matters – announced that the secret document "under national security" of an unnamed state was delivered to the British justice already in 1996. The content of the secred document is about the MST-13 timer fragment which allegedly detonated the bomb.

Which strategy is followed by the SCCRC in relation to the new appeal of Megrahi?

1.> The original tactics of the SCCRC were to justify the release of Megrahi with the four "unimportant" grounds (Megrahi and Malta) as mentionned in the summary of the report and maybe with the 6th ground.

Thus Megrahi would get back his long overdue freedom but the state of Libya would still remain "linked" with the attack on PanAm-103 through the MST-13 timer fragment. As a result all compensation claims und the refunding of US$ 2.1 billion would probably be an impossible task.

2.> The fact that the content of the document was kept secret since the 28th of June 2007 indicates that the document „under national security" should remain suppressed for Megrahi's defence team and the state of Libya ... or that the document was "fabricated" or suddenly discoverd for the purpose to have more judicial possibilities in concern to the MST-13 timer because of the secret status of the document.


MEBO's response to the Scottish machinations

Through MEBO's pressure Ex-MEBO Engineer Ulrich Lumpert signed on the 18th of July 2007 an affidavit. In this document he admits the theft and the unlawful handing over of a MST-13 timer board to an investigation officer (22th of June 1989).

Later on the MST-13 timer board was used by an official agency for the fabrication of the manipulated fragment with the Police no. PT-35.

On the 5th of November 2007 Lumpert's affidavit was also confirmed by the Canton of Zurich by an official apostille.

Additionally to the affidavit of Lumpert witness Edwin Bollier applied on the 22th of August 2007 for international legal assistance at the office 1 of the public prosecutor in the Canton of Zurich in favour of Switzerland against Scotland.

In an letter from the 8th of October 2007 to the High Court in Edinburgh Bollier and Lumpert recommend themselves as witnesses in Megrahi's new appeal. It is obvious that these concentrated and well-aimed actions of MEBO put much pressure on the Scottish justice in Edinburgh.

The result:

To prevent international legal assistance from Switzerland and the potential disgrace for the Scottish justice system and to divert at the same time from the explosive affidavit of Lumpert, the newspaper „The Herald" communicated on the third of October 2007 that behind ground 5 of the SCCRC-report a top secret classified document "under national security" was hidden and that its content is about the MST-13 timer. This after the editor of the Herald was feeded with information from the secret and unpublished 800 pages report of the commission's findings.

At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal court in Edinburgh suddenly confirmed after more than 3 months the existence of a document "under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.

Procecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy added that the secret document did not originate from the USA or one of ist agencies as the CIA.

***

This important document the British justice was in possession of since 1996 was kept away from the judges at Camp Zeist, the judges at the first appeal and Megrahi's defence team.

Immediately after the existence of this secret document was confirmed (19th of October 2007) Megrahi's defence demanded the opening of the document but the appeal court in Edinburgh refused and pleaded for adjournment. The next hearing date was set on the 19th/20th of December 2007.

On the 19th of December 2007 the Appeal Court pleaded for an other adjournment of 8 weeks to decide whether to open or not the document „under national security".

There is probably a reason for the delay of the Scottish justice to annnounce its decision not before the 20th of February 2008.

Because for unknown reasons the judgement in the UTA-772 case didn't take place end of year 2007 as announced, the Scottish authourities didn't want to influence with exonerate evidence in favour of Libya the judgement of their colleagues in the States. Meanwhile (on the 15th of January 2008) the impertinent US judgement over 6 billion US$ happened.

Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC agreed on the 20th of February 2008 to open the secret document but the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminster's representative in Scottish matters - refused so and argued that it was not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed higher national interests: "The national security was at stake"!!!

Seemingly the content of the document "under national security" (MST-13 timer) is so high-explosive that the national security of Great Britain is at stake !!!

The Appeal Court in Edinburgh is expected to comment its decision not to open the secret document during the next days. MEBO will analyze its comment carefully.

Link to Dr. Hans Köchler's statement: http://i-p-o.org/Lockerbie-statement-koechler-25Feb08.htm


Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier-Tavakoli

Governmental interference, political intrigues and
suppression instead of civil and human rights !!!


The Appeal Court in Edinburgh was reported today (20.2.2008) that the Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC had agreed to open the secret text about the electronic MEBO MST-13 timer in the document under "national security" which relieves Libya and its official Mr Megrahi.

But the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!!!
MEBO is very confident that the Libyan Official Mr. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi (political hostage) gets soon back
his honour and liberty after the Scottish Appeal Court in Edinburgh has revised its decision in the "Lockerbie-Affair".



*******************************************************************

THE LOCKERBIE CRYPTO CODE

Only one Lord Advocate was informed in the Lockerbie-Case about the document under "national security". There is a connection between the document under "national security" and the ex Lockerbie- and McKie prosecutor Lord Advocate Colin Boyd QC. On October 5th, 2006 Scotland's top law officer has insisted that his sudden resignation had nothing to do with the Shirley McKie and the Lockerbie case...

Following the announcement in April from 10, Downing Street that Colin Boyd QC, Lord Advocate, is to be appointed to the House of Lords, as of today (14th June 2006) Mr Boyd adopts the title:

"The Right Honourable The Lord Boyd Of Duncansby"

Lord Boyd said:

"It is a great honour, both personally and professionally, to be appointed to serve in the House of Lords. I look forward to playing an effective role in policy making for the UK, especially in relation to Scottish affairs." Lord Boyd was be formally introduced into the House


EXPECTATIONS FOR 2008:

Freedom for the political "Lockerbie-victim" no. 271, Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi and end to the political slandering of Libya by claiming government involvement in the Lockerbie-tragedy. We, Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier (MEBO LTD.), count on true Scottish facts which completely exclude any involvement of the government of Libya without any doubt. The conviction of Mr. al-Megrahi and the government of Libya must very clearly be considered a politically motivated conspiracy. Whether the Scottish High Court on the 20th of February 2008 will open or hold disclosed their decision concerning the "MST-13 document under national security" is actually unimportant. Either decision together with the Affidavit will prove to be positive for Mr. al-Megrahi and the state of Libya; -- any decision will clearly underline that the presently valid sentence is incorrect and premeditated.

Please read, Thomas Thurman: the crook inside FBI?

We should never forget that conspiracies are not theories but crimes.

Already before the beginning of the Scottish court in Kamp van Zeist (2000) at least one offical insider of the Scottish Trial team knew the presence of a document under "national security", which excludes a connection with Libya and the MST-13 timer fragment. Therefore it was clear that the chain of evidence between the PC board MST-13 and the country of Libya was broken...
Scottish Government block on confidential MST-13 document could free Libyan official Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi! The Crown asked for more time to discuss issues surrounding the document. Professor Robert Black (Edinburgh University) said: "This is turning into a complete farce. The whole thing is a shambles and shows the weakness of the Lord Advocate. That she should be prepared to abrogate her decision on disclosure and public interest immunity is disgraceful."

Link to the original german Affidavit

Link: Click here to see the Introductory video in english (CBS,60 Minutes)

The truth about the Timerfragment MST-13 (PT/35)


Zurich, 12th October 2007

Lockerbie bombing appeal opens in fresh appeal

1996, the Crown Office received a Document from an unknown state about the MST-13 Timer under national security ?

SECRET documents which could prove the innocence of the man Abdelbaset al Megrahi, convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, are being hold by a secret government. Prosecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy said the document had not come from the United States or its agencies like the CIA, although he did not disclose the country involved.

Entitled question:
Was Switzerland the unknown state which had delivered end of April 1991, under national security, a document to the Crown Office, about the clear facts over the MEBO MST-13 Timerfragment ? (Polaroidphoto picture, Scottish Police no. PT/35)

High-level negotiations between the UK and the country involved are now taking place to have them released. Libya and his Official have nothing to do with the Lockerbie-Tragedy! Freedom for the political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271 Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now innocent in scottish prisons...


Zurich, 27th August 2007
Links:
deutsch
english

Zurich, 23th July 2007

Link: SCCRC-Cover-Up-Merchants


Zurich, 10th July 2007

UN Lockerbie trial observer Dr. Hans KÖCHLER urges independent inquiry into the case.
Link: Lockerbie:"Expert's, Mysterious Timer (OhmyNews)

Expert witness Edwin Bollier: The mysterious Timerfragment had for Libya’s damage (UN Embargo etc.) by complain against Scotland/UK and USA, a damageworth from about
US$ 40 billions.

"Megrahi’s verdict is the most disgraceful miscarriage of justice in Scotland for 100 Years"--- Professor Robert Black of Edingburgh University, archidect of the PanAm 103 trial held in Kamp van Zeist under Scots Law.

After the win to a new appeal. 

From "The Scotsman" 7. July 2007:
The United Nations observer Dr. Hans Köchler has written to Mr. Salmond and Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary of Scotland, calling for experts from countries not involved in the case to investigate the way the investigaton was conducted by UK and US authorities.
+++
In his letter, Dr. Köchler called for a full and independent public inquiry of the Lockerbie case and its handling by the Scottish judiciary as well as the British and US political and intelligence establishments.
He also called for the SCCRC’s full report to be made public.

The allegedly Lockerbie recovered timerfragment, a manipulated MEBO MST-13 Timer PC-board, which was needed for the criminal Link between the PanAm 103 attempt over Lockerbie and Libya, hase for the state of Libya for a claim-case against the USA and Scotland/United Kingdom, a claim-worth from about US$ 40 billions.

The inadequate SCCRC decision to cover up the criminal manipulations of some Scottish personalities and so granting them to be barred by the statute of Limitation.

Incredible: The main evidence against Libya, the MST-13 Timerfragment was never the subject of any form of chemical trace analyses to see if it had intimate contact with explosives!!! (withness no. 586, Dr. Thomas Hayes, sworn statement. Kamp van Zeist)


Zurich, 6th July 2007
Link: Text in Deutsch

Demand for a criminal Investigation

It's time for the Libyan Leader Muammar Al Gathafi to demand an investigation in the “Lockerbie affair“, with support of the European Union, Scotland’s new Prime Minister Alex Salmond and Britain’s new Prime Minister Gordon Brown, which uncovers the criminal wheeling and dealing by persons of the Lockerbie Criminal Trial team (Crown Office) in Edinburgh and other officers of the Scottish police.

Link: Click here to see the Introductory video in english
(Archive, ABC, BBC Television, Border Television ITN & NBC, A Just Dispatches, Just Television Production for Channel Four Television)

The doubtful and strange behavior of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) must also be analyzed; very obviously certain persons in the British and/or Scottish police and legal system want to cover up something. They conceal their criminal forgery of evidence through suppression of facts in order to release these persons and to enable an explanation of their offenses.

Libya had no motif to place a bomb on PanAm 103

The entire blaming of Libya was the crime of U.S. imperialism against the northern African country Libya. The rest was concocted by U.S. and British government agents and experts who had control over the evidence and manipulated for instance here
the main piece, the MEBO MST-13 Timerfragment where was wrongly linked to Libya!

A case for the Swiss separate investigator of the
Council of Europe in Strasbourg, Mr. Dick Marty, a deligate for secret clearing-up of criminal activities against other countries, like the dirty operations and method's of the CIA and MI-5/6.

Edwin Bollier VR, MEBO Ltd

Zurich, 4th July 2007
ebol

Justice-fraud, Court protocol manipulation on the official CD-ROM.

Important message to the SCCR-Commission:


Please
compare the UN-CD (UNO/res. 1192/Kö) containing the whole official Protocol of the Trial in Kamp van Zeist by the Observer of the International Progress Organisation (United Nations) with the manipulated Version of the Lockerbie Criminal Trail Team, Crown Office (Hispace CD 10,606 p/16/MB).

Among other things
two sequences are cut out:

1.The important sequence from witness no. 548, Edwin Bollier: His statement about the second manipulation on the MST-13 Timerfragment

and the sequence of

2. Edwin Bollier’s examination of the fragment of the MST-13 Timer in the witnessbox at Kamp Zeist.

This lead to the wrong conclusions in the comment of the SCCRC in its Summary spread to the press:

4.1 / SCCRC: The additional submissions also sought to cast doubt on the origin of a fragment of circuit board recovered by forensic scientists which the trial court accepted had been part of the MST-13 timer that triggered the bomb.

Underlying those submissions was the allegation that the evidence of the timer fragment had been fabricated in order to implicate Libya in the bombing. The commission undertook extensive enquiries in this area but found nothing to support that allegation or to undermine the trial court’s conclusions in respect of the fragment.

MEBO’s comment:

Extensive enquiries were not possible because the copy the Commission got was manipulated and several sequences were cut out.

And on top of that a high ranking Scottish Official holds back MEBO’s criminal complaint, dated 11th of July 2000, about the criminal falsification of evidence in the Lockerbie case.


International media pressure on the SCCRC to publish the complete report (800 pages) and its accompanied appendices.

Edwin Bollier VR, MEBO Ltd


Zurich, 3th July 2007
ebol

A new scandal in the „Lockerbie-Affair“!

The SCCR-Commission intentionally helped to hold the truth back.

Only one question to the Chief Executive, Gerard Sinclair, and to the Chairman of the SCCRC-Commission, Dr. Graham Forbes CBE: “Why did the SCCRC refuse all the evidence material about the MST-13 timer?” This is not in accordance with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

MEBO’s commentary on the report issued by the SCCRC on the 28th of June 2007:

What is totally missing in the summary of the 800 pages report and its 13 volumes of appendices given by SCCRC,
are the results of the Scottish Police regarding MEBO’s complaint about the criminal falsification of evidence in the Lockerbie case. The Comission was not in possession of the results of this very important internal police investigation. Because a high ranking Scottish Official holds back MEBO’s criminal complaint, dated 11th of July 2000. This lead to the wrong conclusions made by the commission, see point 4.1.
It is very important that the results of this internal police investigation become available and put in front of the judges at the next appeal.
A registered letter has been sent by post to the
Office of the Procurator Fiscal, Sheriff Courthouse, Dumfries DC-1 2AN, Scotland UK.

See our webside: http://www.mebocom-defilee.ch/ceocities/neupert117.htm.

The report of the SCCRC repeats the same errors in its summary of the trial at Kamp Zeist.
They only mention one part of my statements and therefore falsify my statements with criminal intent, see point
3.3 of the report:

3.3 /SCCRC: The evidence at trial

It was established that the bomb had been triggered by a digital timer known as an MST-13 which was manufactured by a firm based in Switzerland named MEBO. The trial court
accepted the evidence given by one of the partners in that firm, Edwin Bollier, who in 1985 and 1986 had supplied 20 sample MST-13 Timers to Libya.

MEBO’s comment:

What the Commission did
not mention is, that the MST-13 fragment which they showed me (Edwin Bollier, witness no. 548) had been two times manipulated and was not from a type of MST-13 timer delivered to Libya. Although my full statement is kept on record, they knowingly suppressed it.
The second
Scottish manipulation (not made professionally) of the fragment DP/31(a) happened between Bollier’s visit on the 20th of September 1999 at the Principal Procurator Fiscal Depute, Ms Miriam Watson, in Dumfries and the 20th of June 2000 during his testimony at the trial in Kamp Zeist.
Furthermore the fragment shown on the evidence picture at the trial was not the same as the real fragment Bollier had seen with his own eyes on the witness desk in Kamp Zeist. The fragment was now totally carbonized. (See the protocols of the trial.)

A criminal act:
Don’t forget, in June 1989 Mebo Engineer U. Lumpert’s third handmade MST-13 Timer PC-Board, landed in the hands of a Scottish police officer !!!


Important documents concerning the MST-13 timer, which remove the wrongly established link from Lockerbie to the Libyan State:

  • Trial-protocol from Camp Zeist during the 20th of June 2000 to the 25th of June 2000, statements sworn by witness number 548, Edwin Bollier (MEBO Ltd.)

  • Police report from the 16th of September 1999. (Dumfries)
  • Police report from the 17th of September, mentioning that Ded. Thompson was called in by Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary to testify the different colours of the two PC-boards, PT/35(b) and DP/31(a).
  • Criminal Complaint regarding the falsification of evidence in the Lockerbie case, dated 11th of Juli 2000, from the Swiss Law Firm Neupert. Registered letter to the Office of the Procurator Fiscal Sheriff Courthouse, Dumfries DC-1 2AN, Scotland UK.
  • Evidence material directly sent to the SCCRC by MEBO (Edwin Bollier) until the 16th of May 2005. (Ref. RJ/447 SCCRC letter, 30 June 2005)


Regarding point 4.0 / SCCRC: Main grounds that were rejected by the Commission

4.1 / SCCRC: The additional submissions also sought to cast doubt on the origin of a fragment of circuit board recovered by forensic scientists which the trial court accepted had been part of the MST-13 timer that triggered the bomb.
Underlying those submissions was the allegation that the evidence of the timer fragment had been fabricated in order to implicate Libya in the bombing. The commission undertook extensive enquiries in this area but found nothing to support that allegation or to undermine the trial court’s conclusions in respect of the fragment.

MEBO’s comment:

Again the Commission deliberately suppressed all the evidence concerning the
two times manipulated MST-13 Timer fragment. On top of that a high ranking Scottish official is deliberately holding back MEBO’s criminal complaint regarding the falsification of evidence since the 11th of June 2000.

The procedure of the SCCRC tests for a reappeal is absolutely not in accordance with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.


+++

Mr Megrahi’s lawers
reject the SCCRC-ruling on fabrication. Solicitor Tony Kelly said: “We don’t have to limit our appeal on the grounds the Commission has identified. We have carte blanche to make it on as many grounds as we want.”

This includes the claims about the most important fragment of the bomb’s timing mechanism that was allegedly found in the countyside near Lockerbie in the months after the atrocity.

Edwin Bollier VR, MEBO Ltd


Zurich, 28th June 2007
ebol

Link: Text in Deutsch

The Lockerbie-construct is falling apart. Mr. Al Megrahi wins appeal bid. A further step towards Libya’s rehabilitation.

As expected the wrong judgement against Abdelbaset Al Megrahi has been refered to the High Court by the Scottish Criminal Case Review Commission, today, on the 28th of June 2007, as predicted before by MEBO.

The summary (14 pages) of the 800 pages long report of the SCCRC given to the news media has supressed the really important facts which led to a conviction of Mr. Al Megrahi. Mainly that no bombbag-transfer had taken place at Frankfurt Airport from AirMalta KM 180 to PAN/AM 103-A and that the MEBO MST-13 Timer fragment found in Lockerbie was a manipulated piece of evidence.

Instead of MEBO's clear evidence for a miscarriage of justice the international media got fed with minor important facts, as the contradictional statements of a maltesan shopkeeper, Mr. Anthony Gauci, who believed to have seen Megrahi in his shop in Malta. It is ridiculous if the SCCRC takes these statements to serve as explanations for their decision to refer the Lockerbie-case to the High Court.

To cover up the criminal manipulations of some Scottish personalities and so granting them to be barred by the statute of limitation.

However, we congratulate the innocent political hostage and Lockerbie-victim no. 271, Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, for winning his appeal bid. The day of freedom is not far away.

As soon as possible MEBO will check the original report (800 pages) and its appendices and publish a commentary on this Webside.

The summary (14 pages) of the full report can be read on the Webside of the Scottish Criminal Case Review Commission: http://www.sccrc.org.uk

In a statement issued by his lawyers, Mr Megrahi welcomed the Scottish Review Commission's findings and expressed confidence that his innocence would be proved in the appeal process.

MEBO: The Libyan government has never accepted responsibility for the Lockerbie-Attempt and has never paid compensation to the Victim Families. If al-Megrahi's conviction is overturned on appeal, the privat International Gaddafi Foundation for Charity Association at Geneve/Switzerland will moves to reclaim the US$ 2.1 billion that it paid in compensation to the Victim Families.

Still pendent the answer from the
Sheriff Courthouse, Office of the Procurator Fiscal at Dumfries DC-1 2AN, about our Criminal Complaint regarding the Falsification Evidence in the Lockerbie Case (since July 11, 2000)!
See the registered letter on URL: http://www.mebocom-defilee.ch/ceocities/neupert117.htm


21 JUNE 2007

MEBO NEWS RELEASE (miscarriage of justice)

After Tony Blair’s forced outing from 10 Dowing Street on the 27 June 2007, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (the Commission) will announce its decision in aid to the case of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi on 28 June 2007.

Mr Megrahi was wrong convicted in 2001 of the murder of 270 people arising from the bombing of PanAm flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scottland on 21 December 1988.

In accordance with its statutory obligations the Commission’s statement of reasons for its decision in the case, which in this case extends to over 800 pages and will be accompanied by numerous volumes of appendices, will not be made public.

However,
at 12:00 midday on 28 June 2007 the Commission will issue to the media a short summary of its main findings by way of a news release.

Copies of the summary will be available on the Commission’s website, www.sccrc.org.uk and from its offices at 17 Renfield Street, Glasgow UK.


Zurich, 8 June 2007
Ebol short news

The English „Lockerbie Airbubble“ from 7 June 2007
No secret deal over Mr. Al Megrahi’s prison exchange to Libya.

The only correct way that Mr. Al Megrahi can prove his innocence is via the decision from the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) expect in the next days and trough the Scottish legal System!

This is the real way (if Mr. Al Megrahi is cleared) to go back in his homeland Libya. Al-Megrahi has consistently maintained his innocence and has vowed to stay in Scotland and win his freedom through the appeal courts.

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier

It is TIME !

SCOTTISH CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION:
"LOCKERBIE DECISION" READY IN JUNE 2007

Official NEWS RELEASE from: www.sccrc.org.uk

The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission has today (12 February 2007) announced that it is its intention to issue a decision in the case of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al-Megrahi by the end of June 2007.


Zurich, 10 of March, 2007
Wakt: 11:00

The Lockerbie Massacre and its politically motivated damages for Libya

The Lockerbie-Sinner.


> Lord Advocate, Lord Peter Fraser , Baron of Carmyllie, who was Ultimately responsible for the wrong PanAm 103 Lockerbie investigation
and
> Prosecutor of the "Lockerbie-Case" at Camp van Zeist, Lord Advocate, Lord Colin Boyd, who surprisingly gave his demission on 6th of October 2006:

> Alan Feraday and Dr.Thomas Hayes (RARDE) who gave wrong evidence in the hearings of the Lockerbie trial
and
> Thomas Thurman (FBI) expert who first brought up the wrong „theory” of a MEBO Timer MST-13 being the decisive piece of evidence for the bombing of PanAm 103. Meanwhile he has been  fired by the FBI for having manipulated similar evidence in other investigations and was one who was not called to testify?

> The ex Defence Team, defending councels of the crown (DUFF & TAYLOR)


A Libyan proverb says: The truth is the silence of the desert ...

Edwin+Mahnaz Bollier-Tavakoli
MEBO LTD



Zürich, den 2. Februar 2007
Inter


The Lockerbie-Affair awakes!

Edwin Bollier, VR MEBO LTD im Interview mit Berichterstatter Ibrahim Dar Al-Zeid für Al-Jazeera.
Link: Text in Deutsch


Edwin Bollier, VR MEBO LTD, giving an interview to reporter Ibrahim Al-Zeid for Al-Jazeera

DAZ: I’m very pleased to meet you Mr Bollier. Since 1991 you and your business partner try hard to find out the truth for the explosion of PanAm 103 over Lockerbie which lead to the judgement of the Libyan official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi on 31th of January 2000. He was sentenced to 27 years of prison. After the rejected appeal on 14th of March 2002 by a Scottish court the judgement got valid.
Libya was accused to be responsible for this atrocious crime and some Libyan businessmen accepted finally to pay to the families of the victims the enormous compensation of US$ 2.7 billions. By doing so they hoped to lift the drastic economical and political sanctions imposed on Libya by the United Nations since 1999.

DAZ: In your media interviews, TV appearances and detailed internet publications you want to prove that Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and the state of Libya have nothing to do with the Lockerbie Tragedy. Who then, in your opinion, was responsible for the attack on PanAm 103?

EBOL: It is not our final goal to find the real criminals behind the Lockerbie tragedy. These extremely difficult investigations have to be executed by the official investigation authorities of the involved countries, mainly the Federal aviation association (FAA), the German Bureau of criminal investigation (BKA), the FBI and the Scottish Police.
The true terrorists behind the Lockerbie-Affair were not yet prosecuted because of capital errors of investigation and politically motivated, secret intrigues.
Our first concern is to reverse the wrong trial against the Libyan official Abdelbaset al Megrahi and reestablish the honour of Libya. MEBO LTD and myself have obviously been misused by the English Justice and Lord Advocate Colin Boyd to construct a wrong link from Lockerbie to Libya.

DAZ: Despite your logical and by experts uncontradicted argumentation I don’t understand the motivation behind your engagement for Libya and Abdelbaset al Megrahi. 

EBOL: During the Lockerbie investigations my business partner and I myself (MEBO LTD) were unannouncedly visited in our office in Zurich by FBI Agents and officers of the Scottisch police. They showed us a Polaroid picture of a tiny fragment of a PC board of one of our prototypes (MEBO-Timer, Type MST-13), which was never delivered to Libya. In fact about 20 pieces of a similar looking MST-13 Timer had been delivered to Libya’s army two years before the Lockerbie attack, in the context of the war with Tchad. I noticed immediately that the timer fragment on the shown photograph was not identical with the actually delivered timers to Libya.
The shown Lockerbie fragment was a handmade Prototype of a PC-Board which was never delivered to Libya. The timers delivered to Libya were fabricated with machinemade “Thüring Boards”. Furthermore the fragment shown on the picture, which I was later on finally allowed to see with my own eyes, was a demonstrable manipulated MST-13 Board which was never used together with a functioning timer.
The Police officers claimed to have found this fingernail great MST-13 fragment in the wrack parts of the plane near Lockerbie and asserted that it was part of the ignition device of the explosion which caused the crash of PanAm 103.

For more detailed information I like you to refer to our Homepage http://www.lockerbie.ch

DAZ: Unbelievable. What are the consequences?

EBOL: America and Great Britain have indicted on the 13th and 14th of November 1991 the two Libyan citicens Lamin Khalifah Fhimah and Abdelbaset Al Megrahi for being responsible of the explosion of PanAm 103 over Lockerbie.
Furthermore Pan American World Airways Inc. deposed a plaint for compensation of US$ 32 millions against MEBO LTD for total destruction of the Boeing 747.
This claim brought MEBO LTD near to ruin and was a heavy weight on us. We had only one chance: to prove that the shown MST-13 timer fragment was a manipulated piece of evidence.

DAZ: The trials against Megrahi and Fhimah started on 3rd of May 2000 in Camp Zeist in Holland under Scottish jurisdiction. You were present as a witness. What did you obtain?

EBOL: it would led too far to explain all the absurdities of this trial. The accusations were absurd and never worth of being brought before any tribunal. The alleged circumstantial evidences were all built on a wrong and perfidiously constructed plaint. I reproach openly lately resigned Lord Advocate Colin Boyd for having purposely violated the truth.
A fatal error happened when the “Defence Team” (Duff & Taylor) presented me - the most important witness for the defence – before the court as untrustworthy. This appears to be, in my opinion, a secret collaboration between prosecution and defence.
If the defence would have mainly concentrated on the core piece of evidence (MST-13 Timer), the legal proceedings would probably have ended as a boomerang for the prosecution.

Plenty of evidence and facts can be found on our homepage: http://www.lockerbie.ch

The legal proceedings had for us at least one advantage. After the rejected appeal of Megrahi on 24th of March 2002 we had the right to have a close look at all the investigation documents and pieces of evidence from the prosecution and check them. I got copies of the very important and falsified report ST-33 from the German Bureau of criminal investigation (BKA). 

DAZ: Did you get all the decisive documents officially? 

EBOL: Today I believe that these decisive documents which are needed for the reversal of this politically motivated miscarriage of Judgement have been passed to me on purpose. With these reports one can doubtlessly exclude the transfer of a bomb bag from AirMalta Flight KM-180 to PanAm 103/A in Frankfurt. Therefore the constructed chain of evidence from Malta-Frankfurt-London, as presumed in the Lockerbie trial, is absolutely untenable.
Today we can prospect that a reappeal of the Lockerbie trial with all the proved, exonerating evidence is leading to freedom for Meghari and to the reestablishment of Libya’s honour. 

DAZ: Mr Bollier, I believe in your success and thank you for your interview. With the support of the African Union (AU) Libya will be the Heart and Sun of the African Continent.





Zurich den 23. Januar, 2007

Wie parteiisch ist die Europäische Union (EU) unter Deutschem Vorsitz ?
Link: Text in Deutsch

How partial is the European Union (EU) under presidency holder Germany ?

Dear Chancellor of Germany
Dear Mrs. Angela Merkel

On one hand your engagement at the plenary assembly of the European Council on 17th/18th of January 2007 for the liberation of the senstenced to death “HIV Medical staff” of five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian Doctor by a tribunal in Libya is honorable. The Libyan judgement is not yet valid because it was carried to the Libya High Court.

Why on the other hand don’t you intervene actively on the part of the British government for the reappeal of the Libyan Official Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi in the Lockerbie case which is pending since over three years?

The reappeal of the "Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC)" in case of the validly sentenced Libyan citizen and official Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi is delayed for inexplicable reasons. Megrahi is demonstrable innocent, clearly demonstrated by presented and released documents.

As you can draw from my extensive and approved documentation “Lockerbie 2006”, which I sent at one time to the Bundeskriminalamtamt (BKA) in Meckenheim and to the Federal Attorneyship (Bundesanwaltschaft) in Frankfurt, Germany should know that demonstrably the FAA and mainly the BKA is to charge with the reckless investigations of the baggage transfer in Frankfurt which lead to the fatal and wrong conclusion

that a bomb bag was transferred at the airport of Frankfurt from Air Malta Flight KM-180 onto the PanAm plane PA 103/A on 21th of Dezember 1988.

The demonstrable miscarriage of Mr. Megrahi was only possible because the Scottish Court in Camp Zeist (2000) during the hearing of the “bomb bag transfer” in Frankfurt supported exclusively the careless BKA investigation report ST-33 068507/88  as the most important piece of evidence.

The European Union should stand away from current legal proceedings as the “Lybian/Bulgarian HIV Medical Case” or at least consider impartialy and also simultaneously the different affairs of the two parties (“Libya/Reappeal, Lockerbie” and “Bulgarian HIV Medical staff”).

Only a correct procedure is fair and a good policy for the EU. On top such a policy would also build up confidence for the non-members of the EU, as for example Libya and Switzerland.

Through my extensive expert knowledge in the “Lockerbie-Affair” I am convicted that after a reappeal of the “Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission" because of a "miscarriage of the Scottish judgements” Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi is fully reestablished in his honour and freedom and also Libya is discharged from wrong accusations.

The world order has changed since „the Lockerbie indictement“ 1991 and the political scandal “Lockerbie” against Libya should come to an end and the relations with this country should be harmonized.

Since 23rd of September 2003 an application for a reappeal is handed in by Mr. Megrahi (he too a Lockerbie sacrifice, No.271) to demonstrate his innocence. The father of five children is sentenced innocently for life and is waiting since 6th of April 1999 in a Scottish prison for his freedom.

It would be wise to put official pressure on the "SCCRC" by an application of urgency to publish the date of the longly overdue reappeal. I can imagine that after a revised jugdement in accordance with truth, the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi could be moved to a generous amnesty. The momentary not yet valid death sentence against the HIV Medical Team would then be withdrawn.

The publication of an alleged extortion by leader Muammar Gaddafi to use the HIV Medical Team as a hostage in exchange for Meghari is an aimed false report to provoke Libya.

US Ambassador in Bulgaria John Beyerle and Italian Prime Minister Prodi have comfirmed on 16th of January 2007 that there is no connection (mix) between the"HIV Medical team" and the "Lockerbie-Case". Such false reports only disturb all legal efforts and put in question a possible release of all convicts.

Yours faithfully

Edwin Bollier VR
MEBO LTD



Zurich/Switzerland 3 January, 2007 (ebol)

What is the difference between Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and the Bulgarian nurses and the doctor (HIV medical team) ?

Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi is a political prisoner suffering since April 6th 1999 until now, demonstrable innocent, in Scottish prisons and is still waiting for his reappeal by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC).
His sentense (he got life) was a demonstrable miscarriage of the Scottish judgement! An immediately fair judgement, after the "Lockerbie-reappeal" proceeding, would considerably contribute to relaxing relations with Libya.
Therefore,
energetic intervention from U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Secretary of State "Scorpion Lady" Condoleezza Rice, the UN, the EU, Switzerland, the Arab League, the OIC, and Amnesty International part of the British Government, would make complete sense.

Don't forget:
Megrahi's ex-defence team has overseen reckless the criminal motive in Lord Advocate's accusation against Megrahi. After Megrahi's appeal against conviction was rejected on March 14, 2002, several law-scholar, lawyers, international observers and organisations had to said the "Lockerbie judgement" for Abdelbaset Al Megrahi was a miscarriage of judgement without bringing clear facts respectively exonerate-material evidences, or saying why...

Only the privat investigator's in the "Lockerbie-Affair", Edwin Bollier and Mahnaz Bollier-Tavakoli (MEBO) fetched the demonstrable evidence for the false results in the investigation by BKA and FAA, in their report. The MEBO-report from December 15, 2005/06 blames the decisive investigation report ST-33 No. 068507/88 from the German Bundeskriminalamt (BKA police) responsible for the possibility of a false accusation:

>"Bomb-Bag" transfered from AirMalta KM-180 to PanAm 103/A at Frankfurt<

MEBO discovered demonstrable other important exonerate-evidences, like the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (was not delivered to Libya) etc.

All this exonerate-evidence material was hand over (2003-5) by MEBO direct to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and to the USA State.

Only this examined exonerate-evidence will be able for Libya and its "official" released from this burden and honour and freedom will return to Mr. Megrahi.

With the best recommendation in 2007
EDWIN + MAHNAZ  BOLLIER-TAVAKOLI




The Leader of Libya Muammar Al Qathafi- disappointment

Jana 0005 Tripoli/31 December 2006, URL: http://www.jamahiriyanews.com

Jana 0004
Speech of the Leader of Libya at the Meeting with Heads of Churches, Ambassadors of Sisterly and Friendly Countries and Cultural, Political and Religious Activists of the Libyan People.

3rd addendum

Excerpt: >>> We have to know in the interests of whom did the nurses and doctor act in order to kill 400 children. We have to know whose interest was served. They have to answer us. This is very important because such an affair may be repeated sometime later on.

Abdel Basset Al Megrahi's lawyers made an injunction in the sentence. A number of international observers who were present in the court said there are elements of intelligence of that state owning the airliner where most of the victims came. This means the court was false.

All international organisations, including the non-aligned movement, the Arab League, the OIC, the UN etc. said Abdel Basset is a political hostage and is not a convict. International observers also said that foreign intelligence agents were in the court and they were whispering to the judges therefore the court is objectionable.
And despite this nobody said Abdel Basset is to be released. They said the court has ruled and we have to accept the ruling and keep silent. People should say the matter is over becauose the court in Benghazi issued its verdict. We also say to the Scottish court you have to release Abdel Basset. In fact there are rotten standards.
How could various states engage in friendship, co-operation and peace if the dealings are in accordance with such rotten standards and such double standards are practisid?

Those who deceive the world say established a fund for the compensation of families and the treatment of children. All this is false because the fund is emty. We have to expose those countries which claim to have established a fund with money for the treatment of children, all this is rubbish. There is no fund and no state and no company offered any money.,.

COPYRIGHT BY ALGATHAFI: http://www.algathafi.org/en/alknaes_en.htm

November 14, 2006

Please read the Sunday Herald article from 12 November 2006

Lockerbie trial was a CIA fix, US intelligence insider claims
By Liam McDougall, Home Affairs Editor

THE CIA manipulated the Lockerbie trial and lied about the strength of the prosecution case to get a result that was politically convenient for America, according to a former US State Department lawyer.

Michael Scharf, who was the counsel to the US counter-terrorism bureau when the two Libyans were indicted for the bombing, described the case as “so full of holes it was like Swiss cheese” and said it should never have gone to trial.

He claimed the CIA and FBI had assured State Department officials there was an “iron-clad” case against Abdelbaset al-Megrahi and al-Amin Khalifa Fimah, but that in reality the intelligence agencies had no confidence in their star witness and knew well in advance of the trial that he was “a liar”.

Scharf branded the case a “whitewash” and added: “It was a trial where everybody agreed ahead of time that they were just going to focus on these two guys, and they were the fall guys.”

The comments by Scharf are controversial, given his position in US intelligence during the Lockerbie investigation and trial. It also comes at a crucial time as the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) is to report in the coming months on whether it bel ieves there was a miscarriage of justice in the case.

In January 2001, following a trial at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands, Fimah was acquitted and al-Megrahi was sentenced to life in a Scottish jail for his part in the December 1988 bombing.

Scharf joined the State Department’s Office of the Legal Adviser for Law Enforcement and Intelligence in April 1989, just four months after Pan Am Flight 103 was downed and at the height of the CIA’s Lockerbie bombing investigation. He was also responsible for drawing up the UN Security Council resolutions that imposed sanctions on Libya in 1992 in order to force Tripoli to hand over al-Megrahi and Fimah for trial.

He added: “The CIA and the FBI kept the State Department in the dark. It worked for them for us to be fully committed to the theory that Libya was responsible. I helped the counter- terrorism bureau draft documents that described why we thought Libya was responsible, but these were not based on seeing a lot of evidence, but rather on representations from the CIA and FBI and the Department of Justice about what the case would prove and did prove.

“It was largely based on this inside guy [Libyan defector Abdul Majid Giaka]. It wasn’t until the trial that I learned this guy was a nut-job and that the CIA had absolutely no confidence in him and that they knew he was a liar.

“ It was a case that was so full of holes it was like Swiss cheese. ”

Scharf, now an international law expert at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, said he was convinced that Libya, Iran and the Palestinian terrorist group the PFLP-GC were involved in the bombing, which killed 270 people. But, he said, the case had a “diplomatic rather than a purely legal goal”.

“Now Libya has given up its weapons of mass destruction, it’s allowed inspectors in, the sanctions have been lifted, tourists from the US are flocking to see the Roman ruins outside of Tripoli and Gaddafi has become a leader in Africa rather than a pariah. And all of that is the result of this trial,” Scharf said. “Diplomatically, it has been a huge success story. But legally, it just seemed like a whitewash to me.”

Robert Black, professor of Scots law at Edinburgh University and the principal architect of the Lockerbie trial at Camp Zeist, described the Lockerbie case as “a fraud”.

“That the trial at Camp Zeist resulted in a conviction is a disgrace for Scottish justice,” he said. “I think this [Scharf’s comments] indicates that a growing number of people on both sides of the Atlantic now believe they were used in this case.”

Dr Jim Swire, who lost his daughter Flora in the bombing, said: “Myself and Michael Scharf are coming from exactly the same position. I went to the trial and became convinced after watching it unfold that the case was full of holes.”

Tony Kelly, al-Megrahi’s solicitor, said he would not comment while the SCCRC was still examining the case.

No-one at the CIA in Washington was available to comment.

Sunday Herald
http://www.sundayherald.com/59005


Friday October 13, 2006

U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 USA
 
Open letter to the Secretary of U.S. Department of State, Ms. Dr. Condoleezza Rice

Dear Ms. Dr. Rice,
 
As we have learned, you intend soon to visit Tripoli in Libya. Therefore, please allow me to make you aware of the following points for your esteemed understanding:
 
For considerable time, Libya has once again become an important and global role in the oil industry. Libya has the largest oil reserves in Africa after Saudi Arabia. This has probably been known to you for a long time already.
As you also know, the relations between Libya and the outside world are currently strained by 2 pending issues:
Regarding the procedure of the convicted Bulgarian sisters (HIV case), an
appeal proceeding is still continuing.
Concerning the “Lockerbie Case”, I would like to refer you to the following:
 
Libya takes back its US$ 536 million fund for Lockerbie bereaved on April 10, 2005. The money was removed from the escrow (blocked) account in Switzerland, because the
expiry date, on the compensation contract (Kreindler) ended on March 30, 2005.
 
This act was not to protest to the U.S. State Department’s refusal to remove Libya 2005 from the list of states considered to support international terrorism. Libya’s promises ended fair, correct and fulfilled on March 2005.
 
Furthermore, in the “Lockerbie” case, I refer you to the fact that the Scottish Lord Advocate COLIN BOYD
surprisingly resigned on 6th October 2006. This has had a significant role in the miscarriage of judgement, which had the consequent that the Libyan “Official” ABDELBASET AL MEGRAHI was wrongly sentenced. One senior legal Officer said: “On Lockerbie, I think that Colin Boyd personally, not just his office, will be criticised”. The reappeal proceeding, which was started considerable time ago, (23 Sept. 2003) in front of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC), is still pending and a decree of this court instance about the demonstrable “Miscarriage of Justice” is clear. Therefore, energetic American intervention on the part of the British Government would make complete sense.
 
MEBO Ltd. has already delivered an extensive piece of documentation to the American government and the FAA (including expert reports). This clearly makes it apparent that there is no demonstrable evidence that a “Bomb Bag” was planted by Mr. MEGRAHI on the Air Malta flight KM-180 and the subsequent transfer onto the Pan AM plane PA-103.
 
A judgement in the aforementioned reappeal proceeding would considerably contribute to relaxing relations with Libya.
It is time that Libya and its “Official” are released from this burden and honour and freedom are returned to Mr. MEGRAHI.
 
Yours faithfully,
 
Edwin Bollier VR
 
MEBO LTD


Dr. Al-Maua'tasim Biallah Maummar al-Gadhafi visits the political hostage, Abdulbaset al-Megrahi

2006-08-22
Dr. Al-Maua'tasim Biallah Maummar al-Gadhafi paid two days ago a visit to the political hostage, Abdulbaset al-Megrahi in Greenock prison in Scotland to get reassured about his health and state.

The political hostage, Abdulbaset al-Megrahi expressed his appreciation of this initiative of Dr. Al-Maua'tasim Biallah Maummar al-Gadhafi, underlining that it cemented his high spirit by the continuous care of the Leader of the Revolution to raise and follow up his case
.

Libyan Jamahiriya Broadcasting Corporation WWW.LJBC.NET
http://en.ljbc.net/online/news_details.php?id=1760



August 16th, 2006

Excerpt from the National Review Online, by Amir Taheri  >>>

TAHERI: Let us focus on one charge. A senior former intelligence official from your country has been found guilty of organizing the destruction of the PanAm 103 jetliner which led to the death of 270 people over a decade ago.

President de la Fondation Gaddafi de Bienfaisance Internationale.

SAIF EL ISLAM EL GADDAFI: The trial to which you refer was far from fair and proper. I believe that the man who was sentenced to life imprisonment is innocent. This is also the belief of many non-Libyan experts, lawyers, and media people. (Former South African President) Nelson Mandela himself recently went to Scotland to visit the prisoner, and later called for the case to be reviewed by the European Court of Human Rights. Why would Mandela do such a thing if he did not have at least some doubt that the man had been wrongly sentenced?
The evidence used at the court was of the flimsiest kind possible and some of the witnesses were clearly working for the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

TAHERI: But the Libyan government paied $ 2billion in compensation to the families of the victims. Is that not an implicit admission of guilt?

SAIF EL ISLAM EL GADDAFI: The payment to which you refer has not come from the government. It has been made by a nummber of Libyan businessmen who want an end to sanctions imposed by the United Nation and the United States.

+++


Zürich den 1. August, 2006

Fokus auf EINES von mehreren expliziten Justiz-Irrtümer, welcher zum falschen Urteil gegen Abdulbaset Al MEGRAHI im "Lockerbie-Prozess" führte und sich dadurch die Forderung für eine schnelle Reappeal-Zusage durch die SCCRC rechtfertigt.


Unter anderen:
Alleine die folgende unrichtige "Crown-Evidence-Figuration", auf welche sich das  "Original Trial" und danach das "Appeal Trial" in Kamp van Zeist, im Urteil von Abdelbaset Al MEGRAHI (lebenslänglich Gefängnis) abstützte, genügt juristisch für ein "Miscarriage of justice" und somit für eine Reappeal-Erteilung durch die "Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission".
Die "Reappeal-Application" wurde von MEGRAHI am 23. September 2003 bei der SCCRC eingebracht. Woran liegt es, dass bis heute kein Urteil gesprochen wurde?


Die materiellen Beweise (Protokolle und Dokumente):
Der Staatsanwalt im "Lockerbie-Prozess" in Kamp van Zeist hatte, unterstützt von Crown witness (No. 835) Klaus Wunderlich das Gericht vorsätzlich falsch überzeugt, dass ein (1) Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 aus Berlin-Tegel in Frankfurt auf den Zubringerflug PA-103/A nach Heathrow ausserhalb des Tarmac, also direkt on-line von Flug PA-643 auf PA-103/A umgeladen wurde. 


Orginal Textinhalt-Ausschnitt: 6.4.1
Because the baggage did not go through the baggage conveyancing system the bags which were transfered to PA-103 in this way are not included on the KIK computer print out (Crown production 1060). However according to the passenger transfer messages from the Berlin shuttles on 21 December 1988 (Crown production 1089 as spoken to by Klaus Wunderlich (Crown witness 835).

*6.4.1.1 One piece of baggage transferred from PA-643 (which arrived at 13.05 onto PA-103. (not correct, sig. MEBO)

6.4.1.2 Twenty one pieces of baggage transferred from PA-647 (which arrived at 15:05) onto PA-103. (correct, sig. MEBO)

6.4.1.3 Four pieces of baggage transferred from PA-649 (which arrived at 16:05) onto PA-103. (correct, sig. MEBO)


Wieso die falsche Deklaration ?
Das Bundeskriminalamt BKA in Meckenheim DL, welches zusammen mit der Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) die Gepäckabwicklung am Flughafen Frankfurt untersuchten, stellte in ihrem BKA Ermittlungsrapport ST-33-068507/88 u.a. nachweislich fest, dass das eine *(1) Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 über das "Conveyancing-System" in FRANKFURT transportiert und codiert worden war, bevor das "Bag" auf den Flug PA-103/A geladen wurde.
Somit wurde das "Bag" nicht direkt von Flug PA-643 auf PA-103/A ausserhalb des Tarmac umgeladen. Durch diesen Transfer bekam das Gepäckstück eine Tray Nummer und war dadurch auf dem KIK "Computer print out" (Crown Prod.1060) registriert. Die Aussage von Zeuge Wunderlich war nachweislich falsch!

Im BKA-Rapport wurde das Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 dem falschen Counter HM-5 statt dem richtigen Counter 206/V3 zugeteilt.
Garantiert wurde vom BKA die Beladung des Zubringerfluges PA-103/A mit total 136 Gepäckstücken, nachweisbar bestätigt durch Dokumente.

Addition/Aufstellung: 86 Bags am Terminal 1 in Frankfurt eingecheckt + 25 Bags über das Conveyancing System in Frankfurt durchgecheckt + 26 Bags in Berlin eingecheckt davon wurden nur 25 ausserhalb des Tarmac, direkt von Flug (PA-647 mit 21 Bags und von Flug PA-649 mit 4 Bags) auf PA-103/A umgeladen das restliche (1)Bag aus Berlin von Flug PA-643 wurde über das Conveyancing System inklusiv den 25 Bags durchgecheckt = Total 136 Bags


Vorhalt gegen den ehemaligen Staatsanwalt in Kamp van Zeist wegen vorsätzlicher Vereitelung der Wahrheit:
Hinter der falschen Darstellung des Staatsanwalt im "Lockerbie-Prozess", wonach das Gepäckstück des Fluges PA-643 sei ausserhalb des Tarmac direkt von PA-643 auf PA-103/A umgeladen worden, steht für ein kriminelles Motiv. Der korrekte Gepäck Transfer von PA-643 auf PA-103/A  muss vom Staatsanwalt, nach einer einfachen Additions-Kontrolle und der Zuordnung aller Gepäckstücke, passend für seine Anklage, falsch umdeklariert worden sein: 

Die auf PA-103/A total geladenen 136 Gepäckstücke können restlos den Passagieren oder den Fluggesellschaften zugeordnet werden.
Für die falsche Darstellung des Staatsanwaltes, ein "Bomb-Bag" sei in Frankfurt von AIRMALTA  KM-180 auf den Flug PA-103/A transferiert worden, musste für das angebliche "Bomb-Bag" im Conveyancing System ein Counter und ein Tray-Platz geschaffen werden. Der Staatsanwalt hatte deshalb das Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 kurzum in seiner Publik-Anklage Darstellung vorsätzlich aus dem Conveyancing System "ausklariert" und dann falsch, als direkt umgeladenes Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 auf PA-103/A dem Gericht vorgetäuscht.
Durch eine weitere Manipulation konnte schliesslich der Counterplatz 206/V3 um 13:07 Uhr und die ex Tray Nummer B-8849 für den angeblichen "Bomb-Bag"- Transfer umfunktioniert werden.

Es bestand somit ein klares Motiv warum der Staatsanwalt die Tatsache im staatlichen BKA Beweisrapport, wonach das eine Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643 über das Conveyancin System (somit nicht direkt) auf Flug PA-103/A transferiert wurde, unterschlagen hatte. Nur mit dieser "Rochade" konnte der Staatsanwalt dem Gericht eine falsche glaubhaft erscheinende Version vortäuschen. Dadurch ist eine kriminelle vorsätzliche Vereitelung der Wahrheit erfüllt!

Der über die Modalitäten im Gepäcktransfer Airport FRANKFURT, gut instruierte Staatsanwalt, musste zuvor selbst bemerkt haben, dass bei den insgesamt 25 Gepäckstücken (12 on-line + 13 inter-line), welche über das Conveyancing System zu PA-103/A transferiert wurden, kein Gepäckstück dem AirMalta Flug KM-180 zugeordnet werden konnte.
Die Daten der am Main-Checking Terminal 1 in Frankfurt eingecheckten 86 Passagier-Gepäckstücke mit einer Code Nummer zwischen S-0500-0600+Zeit sind korrekt und müssen nicht weiter einbezogen werden.

Der erfundene "Bomb-Bag" Transfer von AIRMALTA Flug KM-180 auf PA-103/A, hätte das Total von 136 auf 137 Gepäckstücke erhöht und ist dadurch definitiv auszuschliessen...

Das damalige Defense-Team, die Advokaten DUFF&TAYLOR, hatten sonderbarer weise dieser wesentlichen falschen Behauptungen der Anklage, zu Ungunsten Abdelbaset Al MEGRAHI, keinen Einspruch erhoben, weil die Advokaten vermutlich aus Unfähigkeit und mangelnden Kenntnissen, der raffinierten Machenschaft des Staatsanwaltes nicht folgen. DUFF&TAYLOR, QC sind 2001 als "Solitors" von MEGRAHI für das Reappeal-Verfahren ausgeschieden worden.

NB: MEGRAHI's "Solicitors" Mr William Taylor QC, mittlerweile "Commissioner" bei der SCCR-Commission, welcher den "Original-Process" und das "Appeal-Cases" von Al MEGRAHI 2001 leichtsinnig verloren hatte, musste als "Commissioner" bei der SCCR-Commission nach der Eingabe von MEGRAHI's "Application" in diesem "Reappeal-Case" als beratender "Commissioner" bei der SCCRC in Ausstand treten.

Fazit:
Es gab keinen Gepäcktransfer von AirMalta, KM-180 auf Flug PanAm 103/A in Frankfurt. Das angebliche "Bomb-Bag" ex Tray No. B-8849 wurde um 13:07 Uhr am Counter 206/V3 gleichzeitig zwischen der Gepäckabfertigung der AirMalta KM-180 am gleichen Counter 206/V3 codiert, war aber nachweislich das Gepäckstück von Flug PA-643(641) aus Berlin-Tegel von Passagierin No. 131 Wiebke WAGENFÜHR.
Bei diesem Gepäckstück handelte es sich um einen grossen roten Stoffkoffer (DDR-Fabrikat) welcher von Passagierin WAGENFÜHR in London-Heathrow ausgecheckt wurde. Somit war gesichert, dass dieser Koffer kein "Bomb-Bag" war und nicht auf den "Mainflight" PA-103 transferiert wurde.

Ohne zusätzlich andere manipulierte Beweise im "Lockerbie Prozess", wie das Mebo MST-13 Timerfragment etc. einzubeziehen, hätte durch diese Vereitelung der Wahrheit die Erteilung des Reappeal zu Gunsten Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi längst erfolgt sein müssen.
Weil nachweislich vom "Original Trial" und im Appealverfahren in Kamp van Zeist falsch angenommen wurde, das Gepäckstück von PA-643 sei direkt auf PA-103/A geladen worden, konnte der falsche Tatbestand, ein "Bomb-Bag" von AirMalta KM-180 sei auf PA-103/A transferiert worden, fingiert und verteidigt werden. Im Endeffekt konnte hauptsächlich durch diese im Mittelpunkt stehende Falsch- Behauptung im Indizienprozess, MEHGRAHI rechtsgültig zu 27 Jahre Gefängnis verurteilt werden. Ein "Miscarriage of justice" ist deshalb erfüllt.

Da in Frankfurt kein Gepäcktransfer von AirMalta KM-180 auf Flug PA-103/A vollzogen wurde, ist die inszenierte Beweiskette Malta- Frankfurt- Heathrow hinfällig.
Das Urteil von Mr Abdelbaset Al MEGRAHI müsste nach dem Reappeal und den neuen Entlastungs-Erkenntnissen, publiziert im Mebo 'Lockerbie Rapport 2006', endlich revidiert werden, damit MEGRAHI und der LIBYSCHE Staat ihre Ehre zurückbekommen und der Politskandal Lockerbie gegen LIBYEN und seine Officials ein Ende hat.

Nach dem Abschluss zur Eingabe der MEBO Entlastungs-Beweisunterlagen für das Reappeal von Abdelbaset Al MEGRAHI, am 16. Mai 2005 an die SCCR-Commission, hatte man auf eine schnelle Erteilung eines Reappeals, spätestens auf den 25. September 2005, gerechnet.
Da die Tatbestände für ein "Miscarriage of Justice in Scotland" eindeutig gegeben waren, hätte nach der Aussage eines schottischen Rechtsgelehrten, das Urteil des Reappeals längst eröffnet werden müssen. Wieso wird dann das überfällige Reappeal der SCCRC bis heute verzögert?

Ist die Antwort für die Verzögerung des Reappeal-Urteils in einer erwarteten Verjährung für kriminelle Manipulationen an Beweisen und Falschaussagen zu suchen?
Auch in dieser Angelegenheit muss die Wahrheit offen gelegt werden.

Edwin Bollier
MEBO LTD


Fragen/Question by e-Mail

>>> back to the info-start-page

NEWS | Archives A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H | Updated: 31.12.2012



Add:
MEBO AG
Edwin Bollier & Lockerbie-Team
CH-8047 Zürich/Switzerland
Tel:
Fax:
E-mail:
E-mail:
+41-44-492.50.20
+41-44-491.72.36
info@mebocom-defilee.ch
mahnaz@bluewin.ch

E-mail: mahnaz@bluewin.ch - URL: http://www.mebocom-defilee.ch
© COPYRIGHT - EDWIN & MAHNAZ  BOLLIER-TAVAKOLI - 8047 ZÜRICH  14.JUNI 2005
MAHNAZ  BOLLIER-TAVAKOLI, PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE
E-mail: mahnaz@bluewin.ch - URL: http://www.lockerbie.ch

The MEBO Inc.-defence team and Edwin Bollier, VR